The platform will undergo maintenance on Sep 14 at about 7:45 AM EST and will be unavailable for approximately 2 hours.
2010
DOI: 10.1002/bit.22937
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Small‐scale and automatable high‐throughput compositional analysis of biomass

Abstract: Conventional wet chemistry methods to determine biomass composition are labor- and time-intensive and require larger amounts of biomass (300 mg) than is often available. To overcome these limitations and to support a high-throughput pretreatment and hydrolysis (HTPH) screening system, this article reports on the development of a downscaled biomass compositional analysis that is based on conventional wet chemistry techniques but is scaled down by a factor of 100 to use significantly less material. The procedure… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
42
1

Year Published

2012
2012
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 51 publications
(44 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
(49 reference statements)
1
42
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The amounts of glucan and xylan in Arabidopsis stem AIR were determined as previously described (52). Hydrothermal pretreat- Fig.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The amounts of glucan and xylan in Arabidopsis stem AIR were determined as previously described (52). Hydrothermal pretreat- Fig.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The most conventional wet chemical techniques employed to gauge lignin content are the acetyl bromide [225][226][227], Klason or acid-insoluble lignin (AIL) [228][229][230][231][232][233][234], and Van Soest methods [227,235]. While these pervasive protocols have provided researchers with tools for obtaining the magnitude of total lignin in a plant, they also have a variety of shortcomings, such as the use of caustic/toxic reagents (H 2 SO 4 , acetyl bromide) and timeconsuming preparations.…”
Section: Wet Chemistrymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While these pervasive protocols have provided researchers with tools for obtaining the magnitude of total lignin in a plant, they also have a variety of shortcomings, such as the use of caustic/toxic reagents (H 2 SO 4 , acetyl bromide) and timeconsuming preparations. DeMartini et al addressed the lowthroughput nature of AIL quantitation by developing an automated process that employed a liquid and powder dispensing robot equipped with an analytical balance for weighing individual vials before and after heating in a reactor block [233]. This downscaled protocol did not allow for ash determination, therefore, the acidinsoluble residue was a combination of lignin and ash.…”
Section: Wet Chemistrymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Standard wet chemical methods provide reliable information about biomass composition and have been proven to work well with both wood and herbaceous feedstock, but they are labor-intensive and time-consuming, which make them inappropriate for industrial applications or large numbers of samples; for example, a complete analysis using wet chemical methods costs $800-2000 per sample [16]. Recent developments in the wet chemical method include a small-scale, high-throughput method that is able to process a large number of samples in reduced time [17]. However, besides the additional costs of the instruments/devices (e.g., powder/liquid-dispensing system), these methods still need development because some components of biomass (e.g., acid-soluble lignin and ash) are not determined.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%