1992
DOI: 10.1111/j.1468-0084.1992.mp54004010.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Small Sample Testing For Unit Roots

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

1995
1995
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
(20 reference statements)
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…test instead of the conventional A.D.F. test, as the latter may be unreliable in case of small sample data is as the case of this study (DeJong et al, 1992;Harris, 1992Harris, , 2009 and is an improvement of the A.D.F. test (Elliot, Rothenberg, & Stock, 1996).…”
Section: Empirical Analysismentioning
confidence: 87%
“…test instead of the conventional A.D.F. test, as the latter may be unreliable in case of small sample data is as the case of this study (DeJong et al, 1992;Harris, 1992Harris, , 2009 and is an improvement of the A.D.F. test (Elliot, Rothenberg, & Stock, 1996).…”
Section: Empirical Analysismentioning
confidence: 87%
“…The ARDL techniques cannot be applied in such a situation (Pesaran et al, 2001). It has been shown that Augmented Dickey Fuller (ADF) test is not reliable in the small sample studies (DeJong et al, 1992;Elliot et al, 1996;Harris, 2009) as is the case with our study.…”
Section: Dynamic Analysis Of the Impact Of The Famentioning
confidence: 53%