1980
DOI: 10.2307/2526364
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Small Sample Properties of Estimators of Distributed Lag Models

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
7
0

Year Published

1984
1984
2007
2007

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

2
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
1
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…(This pattern is similar to those disclosed in Maeshiro [ 1988]). However, the range of <1> 1 , over which the magnitude of the approximate bias is smaller than the magnitude of the dynamic effect (i.e ., the range over which the OLS estimator performs well precisely because of positive autocorrelation in the disturbances) , would be small even for a large value of A, except when the sample size is very small.…”
Section: Journal Of Economic Educationsupporting
confidence: 89%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…(This pattern is similar to those disclosed in Maeshiro [ 1988]). However, the range of <1> 1 , over which the magnitude of the approximate bias is smaller than the magnitude of the dynamic effect (i.e ., the range over which the OLS estimator performs well precisely because of positive autocorrelation in the disturbances) , would be small even for a large value of A, except when the sample size is very small.…”
Section: Journal Of Economic Educationsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…The second group consists of studies by Maddala and Rao ( 1973) and Maeshiro ( 1980), that employed both smoothly trended (e.g., U.S. real GNP series) and 80 JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC EDUCATION nontrended exogenous variables and obtained results from the trended variables that were quite different from those discussed above: consistently superior performance of the OLS estimator, confirming the role of factor 04. In particular, both studies revealed that the range of <j > 1 over which the OLS estimator performs better than an estimator that takes account of autocorrelation in the disturbances increases with A at an increasing rate, confirming the joint role of factors C2 and 02.…”
Section: Comprehending Past Monte Carlo Resultsmentioning
confidence: 89%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Many Monte Carlo studies Dhrymes, 1971, Appendix;Hong and L'Esperance, 1973;Maddala and Rao, 1973; Maeshiro, 1980;Sargent, 1968, Wallis, 1967 have been performed on the following model:…”
Section: Geometric Distributed Lags and Ar(1) Disturbancesmentioning
confidence: 99%