2010
DOI: 10.1111/j.1541-0420.2009.01371.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Small‐Sample Estimation of Species Richness Applied to Forest Communities

Abstract: Many well-known methods are available for estimating the number of species in a forest community. However, most existing methods result in considerable negative bias in applications, where field surveys typically represent only a small fraction of sampled communities. This article develops a new method based on sampling with replacement to estimate species richness via the generalized jackknife procedure. The proposed estimator yields small bias and reasonably accurate interval estimation even with small sampl… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
25
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
1
25
0
Order By: Relevance
“…See also McCrea and Morgan (2015). Ratio regression for the Poisson case has been suggested in Rocchetti et al (2011) and a special fractional polynomial model for the binomial ratio case by Hwang and Shen (2010). This paper develops the most general form of the ratio regression approach as it allows any member of the power series distribution as base distribution, a basically unlimited choice of regression model which is connected to the ratio of neighboring frequencies by a feasible link function.…”
Section: Extensions and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…See also McCrea and Morgan (2015). Ratio regression for the Poisson case has been suggested in Rocchetti et al (2011) and a special fractional polynomial model for the binomial ratio case by Hwang and Shen (2010). This paper develops the most general form of the ratio regression approach as it allows any member of the power series distribution as base distribution, a basically unlimited choice of regression model which is connected to the ratio of neighboring frequencies by a feasible link function.…”
Section: Extensions and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is known that the number of observed forest tree species in regional or national forest monitoring programs typically underestimates the actual number of forest species present in the sampled forests (Cao, et al, 2004;Chiarucci, et al, 2003;Gimaret-Carpentier, et al, 1998;Hellmann & Fowler, 1999;Hwang & Shen, 2010;Lam & Kleinn, 2008;Magnussen & Boudewyn, 2008). The exceptions are in forests with few relatively rare species and in the absence of rare forest tree species.…”
Section: Journal Of Environment and Ecologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They are both easily modified to cope with repeat observations of species incidence data. The third model-based estimator   HW S  is the difference between a time two and a time one estimate of species richness obtained with the estimator proposed by Hwang and Shen (2010). This estimator cannot directly accommodate temporal covariances in species incidence data.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A maximum likelihood variance estimator is provided (Shen & He, 2008). The fourth estimator  hw S is a generalized jackknife estimator of richness (Hwang & Shen, 2010) expressed as the sum of SO and a prediction of the number of unseen species. The latter was obtained from an exponential regression model that predicts a scaled ratio of …”
Section: Estimators Of Species Richnessmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Under these circumstances, few species richness estimators have performed well in Monte Carlo simulations with actual forest inventory data (Magnussen, 2011;Magnussen et al, 2010). Heretofore popular estimators of richness like the Jackknife, the bootstrap, and Chao's coverage-based estimators generally disappoint because they were not designed for sampling with multi-tree quadrants (Hellmann & Fowler, 1999;Hwang & Shen, 2010;Lam & Kleinn, 2008;Palmer, 1991;Schreuder et al, 2000;Schreuder et al, 1999).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%