2018
DOI: 10.1186/s12915-018-0522-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Small RNA profiling of low biomass samples: identification and removal of contaminants

Abstract: BackgroundSequencing-based analyses of low-biomass samples are known to be prone to misinterpretation due to the potential presence of contaminating molecules derived from laboratory reagents and environments. DNA contamination has been previously reported, yet contamination with RNA is usually considered to be very unlikely due to its inherent instability. Small RNAs (sRNAs) identified in tissues and bodily fluids, such as blood plasma, have implications for physiology and pathology, and therefore the potenti… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
31
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 45 publications
(34 citation statements)
references
References 77 publications
2
31
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The data the authors refer to were serum and plasma samples, exosome, cerebrospinal fluid, blood cells, liver, and brain. Two additional studies caution the interpretation of sequencing data to small RNA for potential contaminations in RNA extraction kits or artifacts . In this work, we applied primarily TaqMan‐based assay which provides greatest specificity for miRNAs.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The data the authors refer to were serum and plasma samples, exosome, cerebrospinal fluid, blood cells, liver, and brain. Two additional studies caution the interpretation of sequencing data to small RNA for potential contaminations in RNA extraction kits or artifacts . In this work, we applied primarily TaqMan‐based assay which provides greatest specificity for miRNAs.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Bacterial reads in aqueous humor and CSF, two fluids with very low endogenous RNA content that were collected in a sterile setting (and thus presumed to be sterile), most likely reflect background contamination during the workflow 29 . To illustrate the biological relevance of the bacterial signal, we looked into reads mapping to Campylobacter concisus, a gram-negative bacterium that is known to primarily colonize the human oral cavity, with some strains translocated to the intestinal tract 30 .…”
Section: Fig 4 Circrnas Are Enriched In Biofluids Compared To Tissuesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As both CSF and aqueous humor display a very low relative RNA content, the exogenous sequences may represent bacterial contaminants introduced during the sample processing workflow. Contaminants can derive from contaminated spin columns used during RNA purification29 , enzymes produced in microorganisms42 , or various environmental sources43 . Such contaminant signals are likely underrepresented in samples with high concentration of endogenous exRNAs.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It was argued that the occurrences of low quantity of plant miRNAs in publicly available animal small RNA sequencing datasets might be due to contamination in sequencing methodologies [49,50] It has been recently reviewed that plant miRNAs present in human sera are due to contamination (technical artifacts) rather than dietary intake (regulating the endogenous genes) [48]. This review was based on various experiments from different groups concluding that the exogenous miRNAs are found in humans are due to contamination [49,51,52]. These findings were based on non-detection of plant miRNAs after proper handling to exclude cross-sample contamination in human sperm cells [49].…”
Section: Cross-kingdom Gene Regulation or Contamination Of Plant Mirnmentioning
confidence: 99%