“…In the second scope (Abendroth and Kuna, 2003, 2004; Campitelli et al ., 2004; Hyde et al ., 2013b; Sastry, 2005), efforts have been paid to produce innovative geometry and experimental configuration that have no special equivalent, such as small punch creep test (SPCT) (Blagoeva et al ., 2011; Zhong et al ., 2019; Arroyo et al ., 2019), impression creep test (ICT) (Sastry, 2005; Hyde et al ., 1996), small ring creep test (SRCT) (Hyde et al ., 2013b; Yu et al ., 2021) and small tensile two bar creep test (STBCT), as illustrated in Figure 1. Among these miniaturized techniques, SPCT has been widely utilized as one of useful methods in industrial and academic research (Arunkumar, 2021; Rouse et al ., 2013), which can be further distinguished into (1) shear punch test (Esfandyarpour et al ., 2019) and (2) ball indentation test (Haggag et al ., 1990). In addition to the above reasons, more necessities for developing these miniaturized techniques can be summarized as follows: (1) assessing the material performance required by the industrial and academic, (2) rapid measurement of mechanical properties to assist new material design and development (Dorner et al ., 2003; Sundar et al ., 2000), (3) assessment of material heterogeneities/anisotropic, and conduct localized characterization where conventional standard testing technique is not applicable, for example, the microstructure heterogeneities in welding induced heat-affected zone (HAZ) (Blagoeva et al ., 2011; Bai et al ., 2013; Li et al ., 2016, 2018; Xu et al ., 2020) or anisotropic behavior in addictive manufacturing (AM) material (Wan et al ., 2019a; Neikter et al ., 2019; Wang et al ., 2020), and (4) monitoring the remaining service life of operating components.…”