2022
DOI: 10.1186/s40658-022-00498-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Small nuclei identification with a hemispherical brain PET

Abstract: Background To confirm the performance of the first hemispherical positron emission tomography (PET) for the brain (Vrain) that we developed to visualise the small nuclei in the deep brain area, we compared 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) brain images with whole-body PET images. Methods Ten healthy male volunteers (aged 22–45 years) underwent a representative clinical whole-body PET, followed by Vrain each for 10 min. These two scans were initiated 30 … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…26 Besides HRRT, hemispherical brain PET (Vrain) also has high spatial resolution and improves visualization of small nuclei such as the raphe nucleus. 27 However, they did not evaluate the visualization capability of the LC regions which are < 3 mm in size.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…26 Besides HRRT, hemispherical brain PET (Vrain) also has high spatial resolution and improves visualization of small nuclei such as the raphe nucleus. 27 However, they did not evaluate the visualization capability of the LC regions which are < 3 mm in size.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In another recent serotonergic system study using HRRT, small brain regions such as the raphe nuclei (RN) were excluded from any quantitative analysis due to PVE caused by a combination of limited spatial resolution and sensitivity 26 . Besides HRRT, hemispherical brain PET (Vrain) also has high spatial resolution and improves visualization of small nuclei such as the raphe nucleus 27 . However, they did not evaluate the visualization capability of the LC regions which are < 3 mm in size.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It has been considered that conventional WB PET scanners are inadequate to evaluate small brain structures, including brainstem nuclei, because of their relatively poor spatial resolution. Indeed, several reports have described PET-tracer uptake in the brainstem nuclei using head-dedicated PET scanners [ 12 , 13 , 16 ]. For example, Takahashi et al described that FDG uptake in small brainstem nuclei such as the IC, RN, and MRN were more clearly detected by a brain-dedicated PET system with a hemispherical shape than by WB PET [ 12 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Indeed, several reports have described PET-tracer uptake in the brainstem nuclei using head-dedicated PET scanners [ 12 , 13 , 16 ]. For example, Takahashi et al described that FDG uptake in small brainstem nuclei such as the IC, RN, and MRN were more clearly detected by a brain-dedicated PET system with a hemispherical shape than by WB PET [ 12 ]. Thus, to the best of our knowledge, the present study is the first to clarify the utility of WB SiPM-PET with application of dedicated OSEM with TOF and PSF reconstruction to detect physiological FDG uptake in and around the brainstem (including ION, DN, MRN, IC, MB, RN, STN, LGN, MGN, and SC) with reference to the anatomical locations on 3D-MRI.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation