2011
DOI: 10.1124/dmd.111.040865
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Small Molecule Quantification by Liquid Chromatography-Mass Spectrometry for Metabolites of Drugs and Drug Candidates

Abstract: ABSTRACT:Identification and quantification of the metabolites of drugs and drug candidates are routinely performed using liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry (LC-MS). The best practice is to generate a standard curve with the metabolite versus the internal standard. However, to avoid the difficulties in metabolite synthesis, standard curves are sometimes prepared using the substrate, assuming that the signal for substrate and the metabolite will be equivalent. We have tested the errors associated with this … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
62
0
1

Year Published

2012
2012
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 48 publications
(66 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
(32 reference statements)
3
62
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Underlying assumption is that either the UV-absorption (when using UV) or the ionization efficiency (in LC/MS/MS) of the metabolite(s) is similar to the parent NME. Both the assumptions warrant cautious evaluation (Dahal et al, 2011) depending on the nature of the biotransformation of the NME.…”
Section: General Guidelines For Enzyme Reaction Phenotypingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Underlying assumption is that either the UV-absorption (when using UV) or the ionization efficiency (in LC/MS/MS) of the metabolite(s) is similar to the parent NME. Both the assumptions warrant cautious evaluation (Dahal et al, 2011) depending on the nature of the biotransformation of the NME.…”
Section: General Guidelines For Enzyme Reaction Phenotypingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For phase I metabolites which are structurally similar to the parent, the FS MS response is likely to be different by up to an order of magnitude of each other [17]. For phase I and II metabolites which are significantly different to that of the parent, such as cleavage of large functionalities or conjugations, the difference in MS response is likely to be even greater.…”
Section: Sample Preparation and Acquisition Strategymentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Furthermore, LC gradients affect the MS response, as compounds with different retention times are sprayed into the mass spectrometer in different solvent compositions [6]. Using nanospray ionization (NSI) [5,6,8,9] or captive spray ionization (CSI)-LC-MS [10,11] reduces differences in the ionization efficiency between drugs and their metabolites, but these techniques are currently not robust enough to be a strong option in post-mortem toxicology.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%