2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.aca.2016.08.021
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Small molecule probes finely differentiate between various ds- and ss-DNA and RNA by fluorescence, CD and NMR response

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
17
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

4
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Furthermore, 1 binds to ds‐DNA/RNA as a groove binder but, in contrast with most groove binders, it also interacts strongly with ss‐RNA, by acting as a spindle around which ss‐RNAs are wrapped due to a combination of electrostatic, H‐bonding and hydrophobic interactions. As most small molecule interactions with ss‐RNA are based on an intercalative binding mode, often combined with additional H‐bonding, whereby helicity of ss‐RNA is preserved or even enhanced, the binding mode of 1 presented herein is unique. Such ss‐RNA condensation due to complexation (extended strand to globular transformation) could protect its backbone against RNAase degradation and also facilitate its cellular uptake and distribution, opening new possibilities for RNA‐based applications.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, 1 binds to ds‐DNA/RNA as a groove binder but, in contrast with most groove binders, it also interacts strongly with ss‐RNA, by acting as a spindle around which ss‐RNAs are wrapped due to a combination of electrostatic, H‐bonding and hydrophobic interactions. As most small molecule interactions with ss‐RNA are based on an intercalative binding mode, often combined with additional H‐bonding, whereby helicity of ss‐RNA is preserved or even enhanced, the binding mode of 1 presented herein is unique. Such ss‐RNA condensation due to complexation (extended strand to globular transformation) could protect its backbone against RNAase degradation and also facilitate its cellular uptake and distribution, opening new possibilities for RNA‐based applications.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, for another polynucleotide, the same ligand can give only one binding mode based on the uniform aggregation at excess of ligand over polynucleotide bases at r > 0.4 ( Fig. 8 , right) [ 30 ].…”
Section: Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“… CD titration of poly rA-poly rU (left) and poly rU (right) ( c (polynucleotide) = 2.0 × 10 −5 mol dm −3 ) with ligand L at molar ratios r = [L]/[polynucleotide] (pH 7.0, sodium cacodylate buffer, I = 0.05 mol dm −3 ). Adapted from [ 30 ]. …”
Section: Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The UV/Vis spectra of new dyes revealed strong hypochromic and moderate bathochromic effect upon titration with ds-DNA and ds-RNA. Detailed analysis of titration data was hampered by aggregation of 4b, since it was not possible to distinguish the effects of the aggregation-disaggregation equilibrium from the dye monomer binding to DNA and eventually formation of dye aggregate within the DNA/RNA (often reported for cyanine dyes (Crnolatac et al 2016); (Crnolatac et al 2013); (Tumir et al 2012)). Fortuitously, intrinsically non-fluorescent 4a, 4b upon titration with polynucleotides revealed strong emission (Fig.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%