2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.energy.2010.03.028
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Small-molecule gas sorption and diffusion in coal: Molecular simulation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

4
153
1

Year Published

2011
2011
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 179 publications
(158 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
4
153
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The results showed that the order of magnitude of CO 2 diffusion coefficient in coal was at 10 −9 m 2 /s, which was close to the experimental results. Combined with the Maxwell-Stefan diffusion theory, Hu calculated the mutual diffusion coefficients of mixtures [43]. The adsorption capacity of CO 2 is greater than that of CH 4 under a certain temperature and pressure.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The results showed that the order of magnitude of CO 2 diffusion coefficient in coal was at 10 −9 m 2 /s, which was close to the experimental results. Combined with the Maxwell-Stefan diffusion theory, Hu calculated the mutual diffusion coefficients of mixtures [43]. The adsorption capacity of CO 2 is greater than that of CH 4 under a certain temperature and pressure.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As shown in the latest surveys, there is much interest in the method of CO 2 capture, utilization, and storage (CCUS) which has been considered one of the most useful means to control the level of rising global CO 2 (Bachu 2008;Hou et al 2012;Yang et al 2012;Mitiku and Bauer 2013;Brown et al 2014;Bai et al 2015;Liu et al 2015a, b). Under this circumstance, storing CO 2 in underground unminable coal seams can keep CO 2 in its stable state and increase the output of methane, as trialed in some countries (Damen et al 2005;Hu et al 2010). Although CO 2 is most probably to be sequestered in its natural state owing to its chemical stability, some other means also exist for dealing with CO 2 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…The feasibility of this solution has, especially, been the focus of a detailed research project by a European group under conditions close to those beneath the North Sea (Holloway et al 1996). As reported recently, CO 2 has also been injected into deep un-minable coal seams both as a means of storage and to increase the exploitation of methane using a method similar to that for the enhanced oil recovery (EOR) programs in the Texas oilfields in the United States (Hu et al 2010;Pearce et al 1996). Although carbon dioxide can be sequestered in porous reservoir rocks below a certain depth using the present technology, the problems of storing it in the subsurface cannot be resolved fundamentally due to the possibility of long-term geological disasters when it leaks to the surface.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%