1991
DOI: 10.1007/bf02393842
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Small mammal abundance and habitat relationships on deciduous forested sites with different susceptibility to gypsy moth defoliation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
17
1

Year Published

2000
2000
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
17
1
Order By: Relevance
“…There is considerable empirical evidence in our system that densities of generalist predators are higher at lower elevations (Campbell 1981;Smith 1983Smith , 1985Yahner and Smith 1991;Brooks et al 1998), yet we did not find a simple positive relationship between elevation and the strength of cyclicity in gypsy moth outbreaks. From low to intermediate elevation, outbreak cyclicity increased with increasing elevation.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 64%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…There is considerable empirical evidence in our system that densities of generalist predators are higher at lower elevations (Campbell 1981;Smith 1983Smith , 1985Yahner and Smith 1991;Brooks et al 1998), yet we did not find a simple positive relationship between elevation and the strength of cyclicity in gypsy moth outbreaks. From low to intermediate elevation, outbreak cyclicity increased with increasing elevation.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 64%
“…However, above intermediate predator densities, we found that a predator exhibiting a type-II functional response could cause gypsy moth density to remain extremely low for long periods of time and reduce cyclicity in host-pathogen oscillations. Given these findings, the elevational gradient in generalist predator (small mammal) density (Campbell 1981;Smith 1983Smith , 1985Yahner and Smith 1991;Brooks et al 1998) and the rate at which they feed on gypsy moth pupae (i.e., lower rate of feeding at high elevation; Smith 1989) could underlie the elevational patterns of cyclicity displayed by gypsy moth populations.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 95%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Consistent with this hypothesis, Johnson et al (2006a) reported that gypsy moths had a dominant 5-year period and no indication of a 10-year period in areas where oaks grow in dry soils (e.g., oak-pine forests), which tend to support low densities of generalist rodent predators (Smith 1985;Yahner and Smith 1991;Liebhold et al 1995).…”
Section: D)mentioning
confidence: 78%
“…Differences in periodicity among forest stands may be caused by intrinsic differences in forest communities such as differences in the availability of gypsy moth hosts, densities of generalist predators (Campbell and Sloan 1977;Elkinton and Liebhold 1990), or the covariation of these or other factors. For example, oak species dominate as the moth's most preferred hosts in North America but they also provide the main winter food source (acorns) for generalist predator rodents such as Peromyscus leucopus, which prey opportunistically upon gypsy moth pupae (Smith 1985;Yahner and Smith 1991). Given the potential for scale-dependent population behavior and spatial covariation in factors influencing forest insect population growth, advancing our understanding of forest insect outbreaks will require spatially explicit analyses and a multi-scale approach.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%