2013
DOI: 10.1097/mog.0b013e32835cf253
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Small intestinal stem cells

Abstract: This brief review provides a general historical perspective of our understanding of the delineation of the two ISC populations. Furthermore, it discusses the known ISC markers and how these markers have been used to isolate and characterize ISC populations.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

1
4
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 52 publications
1
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Maintenance of the intestinal stem cell niche, including Paneth cells and mesenchymal cells such as intestinal subepithelial myofibroblasts, is believed to be critical to intestinal stem cell health. 43 In support of this hypothesis we previously identified preserved epithelialmesenchymal relationships during TESI formation. 12 Based on our published observations in TESI, 12 we expected to observe conservation of original epithelial-mesenchymal spatial relationships in TEE (Fig.…”
Section: Ck13supporting
confidence: 58%
“…Maintenance of the intestinal stem cell niche, including Paneth cells and mesenchymal cells such as intestinal subepithelial myofibroblasts, is believed to be critical to intestinal stem cell health. 43 In support of this hypothesis we previously identified preserved epithelialmesenchymal relationships during TESI formation. 12 Based on our published observations in TESI, 12 we expected to observe conservation of original epithelial-mesenchymal spatial relationships in TEE (Fig.…”
Section: Ck13supporting
confidence: 58%
“…Current literature suggests there are two broad categories of ISCs: an actively cycling population found at the crypt base and marked by Lgr5; and one (or more) relatively quiescent population(s) located a little higher in the crypt (Barker, et al, 2012, Carlone and Breault, 2012, King and Dekaney, 2013, Potten, et al, 2009, Shaker and Rubin, 2010). The former, herein designated “active ISCs”, are believed to be primarily responsible for daily turnover of the epithelium under homeostatic conditions, whereas the latter, designated “reserve ISCs”, appear to function as a source of epithelial replacement and crypt regeneration after intestinal damage.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There have been recent strides in the characterization of both ISC biology, and the niche they occupy (Barker et al, 2012; King and Dekaney, 2013; Lund, 2012; Noah et al, 2011). These advances have in large part been a product of transgenic reporter mice.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%