1956
DOI: 10.1016/s0016-5085(19)35847-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Small Intestinal Function in the Rat After Massive Resections

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

1959
1959
2006
2006

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 37 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, previous observations regarding the contribution of different segments to the enterogastric brake are controversial. It was shown previously in rats that gastric emptying of liquids was found to be normal after jejunal resection, but fast or slow after ileal resection 28,29 . Gastric emptying of liquids and solids is normal in short bowel patients with a colon, whereas it is faster in those patients without a colon 2,9,28,29 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 84%
“…However, previous observations regarding the contribution of different segments to the enterogastric brake are controversial. It was shown previously in rats that gastric emptying of liquids was found to be normal after jejunal resection, but fast or slow after ileal resection 28,29 . Gastric emptying of liquids and solids is normal in short bowel patients with a colon, whereas it is faster in those patients without a colon 2,9,28,29 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 84%
“…Although the 50% emptying of liquid was not significantly different from normal for the patient group as a whole, it was faster than normal in three patients ( Fig 1A). The amount of liquid in the stomach at six hours was significantly increased compared with normal subjects (p<001) and in five patients was more than the normal mean (2SDs) (7,7,8,12, and 3 1%).…”
Section: Problems In Determining Gastric Emptyingmentioning
confidence: 79%
“…It is thus understandable why the severity of fat malabsorption depends on the region of the small intestine not functioning. When the distal half of the small intestine was removed [13] or taken out of continuity with the proximal half [14••], fecal fat increased from the normal 8% to 10% of ingested amount to 80% to 90%, indicating severe steatorrhea. However, nutrient loss was far less when the proximal 50% to 70% of the small intestine was resected, with fecal fat loss of 15% to 24% [14••].…”
Section: Jejunal Versus Ileal Brakementioning
confidence: 99%