2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.actbio.2016.01.025
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Small hydrophobe substitution on polyethylenimine for plasmid DNA delivery: Optimal substitution is critical for effective delivery

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
26
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

3
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
2
26
0
Order By: Relevance
“…S2, Pearson correlation, p > 0.05). This was quite expected since, as already observed in similar systems [16,19], increasing hydrophobic-moiety degree of substitution initially improves transfection until the attainment of an optimum after which efficiency decreases due to the excessive reduction of the number of amines available for DNA condensation.…”
Section: Transfection Of Vsmcs By Bpei Derivativesmentioning
confidence: 62%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…S2, Pearson correlation, p > 0.05). This was quite expected since, as already observed in similar systems [16,19], increasing hydrophobic-moiety degree of substitution initially improves transfection until the attainment of an optimum after which efficiency decreases due to the excessive reduction of the number of amines available for DNA condensation.…”
Section: Transfection Of Vsmcs By Bpei Derivativesmentioning
confidence: 62%
“…Of note, to find out the optimal chemical structures and to draw overall structure-activity relationships, different bPEI backbone MWs and degrees of substitution were tested. [17,19]; the reaction feed ratio and the resulting degree of substitution, as measured by 1 H-NMR, of the resulting polymers are reported in Table 1. As expected, the degree of substitution increased by increasing the feed ratio for every lipid, to give an average yield between 0.54 and 0.56 for all the substituents except St and LA that displayed a significantly lower average yield of 0.37 and 0.38 respectively.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations