Small farmers and sustainability: Institutional barriers to investment and innovation in the Malaysian palm oil industry in Sabah

Abstract

The Malaysian palm oil industry is well known for the social, environmental and sustainability challenges associated with its rapid growth over the past ten years. Technologies exist to reduce the conflict be-tween national development aims of economic uplift for the rural poor, on the one hand, and ecological conservation, on the other hand, by raising yields and incomes from areas already under cultivation. But the uptake of these technologies has been slow, particularly in the smallholder sector. In this paper we explore the societal and institutional challenges that influence the investment and innovation decisions of micro and small enterprise (MSE) palm oil smallholders in Sabah, Malaysia. Based on interviews with 38 smallholders, we identify a number of factors that reduce the smallholders' propensity to invest in more sustainable practices. We discuss why more effective practices and in-novations are not being adopted using the concepts of, firstly, institutional logics to explore the internal dynamics of smallholder production systems, including attitudes to sustainability and innovation; and, secondly, institutional context to explore the pressures the smallholders face, including problems of access to land, labour, capital, knowledge and technical resources. These factors include limited access to global market information, corruption and uncertainties of legal title, weak economic status and social exclusion. In discussing these factors we seek to contribute to wider theoretical debates about the factors that block innovation and investment in business improvements in marginal regions and in marginalised groups

Co-constructing sustainability: Agencing sustainable coffee farmers in Uganda

“…Recent research emerging from within rural studies employ similar approaches to investigate sustainability and alternative, Third-Party Certification (TPC) markets (Konefal and Hatanaka, 2011;Le Velly and Dufeu, 2016). Here, Konefal and Hatanaka (2011) call for a more embracing perspective of TPC which reconciles the views of Northern and Southern actors in particular (see also Raynolds et al, 2007;Loconto, 2010), and accounts for the lived experiences of Southern producers (see Martin et al, 2015). In their portrayal of farmers as marginalized, Konefal and Hatanaka (2011: 126) reveal that, TPC standards enact performatively and construct realities through continuous processes of "politicking, maneuvering, and negotiating" between Southern actors and the Northern counterparts.…”

“…This focus is particularly important given that smallholder farmers appear reluctant to engage with external sustainability initiatives, and have been found to prefer local interactions where possible (Martin et al, 2015). It seems appropriate then to take a performative approach to sustainability which contributes to illuminate the diverse contexts, actors and interactions involved in constructing sustainability, and to the unfolding transformations enabled.…”

On yield gaps and better management practices in Indonesian smallholder oil palm plantations

“…In smallholder oil palm production, the same agronomic principles apply, but smallholders face a range of unique constraints and challenges (Martin et al, 2015;Euler et al, 2016a;Woittiez et al, 2018a). Smallholders have less investment capacity and less access to knowledge and inputs (Molenaar et al, 2010).…”

Institutional Legitimacy, Cross-Border Trade and Institutional Voids: Insights from the Cocoa Industry in Ghana

“…In the final third of the twentieth century, it became apparent that one of the most distinctive features of emerging economies is the existence of 'institutional voids' (Khanna and Palepu, 1999;Luo and Chung, 2013;North, 1990), referred to as the lack of or weak institutional facilities and regulations which support the well-functioning of an economy (Luo and Tung, 2007; see also Martin, Rieple, Chang, Boniface and Ahmed, 2015). In the subsequent years, a plethora of scholarly works has emerged on supply chain partnerships in emerging economies which articulates the ramifications of such voids and their ability to instigate partners' opportunism (Liu, Luo, and Liu, 2009).…”