2010
DOI: 10.1167/iovs.09-3682
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Small Effect of Interline Spacing on Maximal Reading Speed in Low-Vision Patients with Central Field Loss Irrespective of Scotoma Size

Abstract: Increasing interline spacing is advisable only for very slow readers (<20 words/min) who want to read a few words (spot reading). Vertical crowding does not seem to be a major determinant of maximal reading speed for patients with central scotomas.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

3
31
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 40 publications
(34 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
3
31
0
Order By: Relevance
“…On the other hand, unlike RSVP reading, the role of visual crowding in ordinary text reading (eye-mediated reading) is still unclear, as studies have reported little effect of reduced crowding on ordinary reading speed (Bernard et al, 2007; Calabrese et al, 2010; Chung, Jarvis, Woo, Hanson, & Jose, 2008). As reading is a complex cognitive process involving various perceptual and cognitive components (e.g., sensory and perceptual encoding of text, oculomotor control, and linguistic influences), the outcome is likely to be changed depending on its interaction with other components.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the other hand, unlike RSVP reading, the role of visual crowding in ordinary text reading (eye-mediated reading) is still unclear, as studies have reported little effect of reduced crowding on ordinary reading speed (Bernard et al, 2007; Calabrese et al, 2010; Chung, Jarvis, Woo, Hanson, & Jose, 2008). As reading is a complex cognitive process involving various perceptual and cognitive components (e.g., sensory and perceptual encoding of text, oculomotor control, and linguistic influences), the outcome is likely to be changed depending on its interaction with other components.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recent psychophysical evidence shows that when the disorder has been present for a long time, many people with AMD exhibit characteristics that are more similar to those usually found in the normal fovea, and different from those usually observed in the normal periphery. Such evidence includes the lack of a benefit of reading text with line spacing greater than the standard (Chung et al, 2008; Calabrèse et al, 2010), 4 and that the crowding zone measured at the PRL used by people with AMD is isotropic as in the normal fovea (Toet & Levi, 1992); instead of anisotropic in shape (Chung, 2013b). The changes observed in some spatial properties at the PRL of people with AMD have been attributed to the plasticity of the visual system.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This seems to contradict some of the evidence showing that there is less crowding at the PRL in observers with AMD than in the normal periphery. 6063 Note however that in the present study, we only determined the size of the integration field along the horizontal meridian. It remains possible that the integration field could shrink in its dimensions along other meridians for people with central vision loss, as shown in Chung and Lin.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%