2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.jhep.2020.09.018
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Small diameter shunts should lead to safe expansion of the use of TIPS

Abstract: Transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) is increasingly used worldwide to treat the complications of portal hypertension in patients with advanced cirrhosis. However, its use is hampered by the risk of causing hepatic encephalopathy and of worsening liver function. The reported haemodynamic targets used to guide TIPS are too narrow to be achieved in most cases and are perhaps not entirely adequate nowadays as they were obtained in the pre-covered stent era. We propose that small diameter TIPSalone… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
40
1

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 41 publications
(48 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
2
40
1
Order By: Relevance
“…On the other hand, it is likely that what could appear an insufficient reduction in PPG (to 14.5 mmHg, for instance) could be more than enough in a patient with a baseline PPG of 30 mmHg, or even if initial PPG was 21 mmHg, provided that the TIPS was complemented with a small dose of propranolol or with embolization of the collaterals (if TIPS was done to prevent rebleeding). 2 The experience of Wang et al 1 is in agreement with the above reasoning. They show equal results in terms of efficacy, adverse effects and survival between patients treated with covered 8 mm stents and collateral occlusion irrespective of achieving or not a final PPG below 12 mmHg (83% of the cohort) or not.…”
supporting
confidence: 61%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…On the other hand, it is likely that what could appear an insufficient reduction in PPG (to 14.5 mmHg, for instance) could be more than enough in a patient with a baseline PPG of 30 mmHg, or even if initial PPG was 21 mmHg, provided that the TIPS was complemented with a small dose of propranolol or with embolization of the collaterals (if TIPS was done to prevent rebleeding). 2 The experience of Wang et al 1 is in agreement with the above reasoning. They show equal results in terms of efficacy, adverse effects and survival between patients treated with covered 8 mm stents and collateral occlusion irrespective of achieving or not a final PPG below 12 mmHg (83% of the cohort) or not.…”
supporting
confidence: 61%
“…As I emphasized, hemodynamic targets for TIPS are largely based on studies from the pre-covered stent era, when TIPS dysfunction was extremely common. 2 At that time, we showed that reducing the portal pressure gradient (PPG, the difference between portal vein and hepatic vein pressure) to values below 12 mmHg was necessary to prevent rebleeding or ascites, but that reductions below 10 mmHg were associated with an increased risk of encephalopathy. 3 Thus, it was difficult to achieve the correct balance between protecting against portal hypertension and not causing excessing shunting of portal blood away from the liver.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Certain risk factors (e.g., advanced age, cardiopulmonary insufficiency, and sarcopenia) predispose patients to more complications post-TIPS and hepatic encephalopathy (86)(87)(88), although sarcopenia per se may not affect survival after TIPS insertion for RA (89). TIPS stents with a smaller (8-10 mm) diameter than conventional ones have been associated with lower incidence of post-TIPS hepatic encephalopathy without compromising the efficacy on ascites control (90)(91)(92). A recent study suggests that TIPS inserted at an earlier stage of ascites' natural history (such as those with recurrent ascites) could result in fewer side effects and improved survival when compared to LVP (93).…”
Section: Transjugular Intrahepatic Portosystemic Shunt and Ltmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…86 Therefore, it could well be that using smaller stents may expand the indication of TIPS in patients with refractory ascites and compromised liver function. 94 This should obviously be evaluated in adequate clinical studies.…”
Section: S142mentioning
confidence: 99%