Small Dense Low‐Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol Is the Most Atherogenic Lipoprotein Parameter in the Prospective Framingham Offspring Study

Abstract

Background Elevated plasma levels of direct low‐density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL‐C), small dense LDL‐C (sdLDL‐C), low‐density lipoprotein (LDL) triglycerides, triglycerides, triglyceride‐rich lipoprotein cholesterol, remnant lipoprotein particle cholesterol, and lipoprotein(a) have all been associated with incident atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD). Our goal was to assess which parameters were most strongly associated with ASCVD risk. Methods and Results Plasma total cholesterol, triglycerides, high‐density lipoprotein cholesterol, direct LDL‐C, sdLDL‐C, LDL triglycerides, remnant lipoprotein particle cholesterol, triglyceride‐rich lipoprotein cholesterol, and lipoprotein(a) were measured using standardized automated analysis (coefficients of variation, <5.0%) in samples from 3094 fasting subjects free of ASCVD. Of these subjects, 20.2% developed ASCVD over 16 years. On univariate analysis, all ASCVD risk factors were significantly associated with incident ASCVD, as well as the following specialized lipoprotein parameters: sdLDL‐C, LDL triglycerides, triglycerides, triglyceride‐rich lipoprotein cholesterol, remnant lipoprotein particle cholesterol, and direct LDL‐C. Only sdLDL‐C, direct LDL‐C, and lipoprotein(a) were significant on multivariate analysis and net reclassification after adjustment for standard risk factors (age, sex, hypertension, diabetes mellitus, smoking, total cholesterol, and high‐density lipoprotein cholesterol). Using the pooled cohort equation, many specialized lipoprotein parameters individually added significant information, but no parameter added significant information once sdLDL‐C (hazard ratio, 1.42; P <0.0001) was in the model. These results for sdLDL‐C were confirmed by adjusted discordance analysis versus calculated non–high‐density lipoprotein cholesterol, in contrast to LDL triglycerides. Conclusions sdLDL‐C, direct LDL‐C, and lipoprotein(a) all contributed significantly to ASCVD risk on multivariate analysis, but no parameter added significant risk information to the pooled cohort equation once sdLDL‐C was in the model. Our data indicate that small dense LDL is the most atherogenic lipoprotein parameter.

Do All Integrase Strand Transfer Inhibitors Have the Same Lipid Profile? Review of Randomised Controlled Trials in Naïve and Switch Scenarios in HIV-Infected Patients

“…LDL consists of multiple subclasses that differ in size, density, lipid, and apolipoprotein composition, metabolic behaviour, and correlation with CV risk. The predominance of small and dense LDL particles, the so-called LDL phenotype B, is reported in lipid disorders, obesity, and type 2 diabetes, and is considered a relevant risk factor for atherogenesis and coronary heart disease [48][49][50]. Oxidized lipoproteins, both LDLox and HDLox, have atherogenic properties [51].…”

Novel Therapeutical Approaches to Managing Atherosclerotic Risk

“…Both LDL and HDL are heterogeneous in nature, including various subfractions depending on the isolation method, with up to 7 and up to 10 distinct different subspecies for LDL and HDL, respectively [ 4 ]. The predominance of sdLDL has been shown over the years to be an important and independent predictor of cardiovascular events and progression of coronary heart disease, even independently of LDL-cholesterol concentrations [ 3 , 4 , 95 ]. Therefore, it has become evident that the quality rather than only the quantity of LDL is closely related to cardiovascular risk, and estimating sdLDL in clinical practice helps to identify patients at higher risk of future cardiovascular events and helps to direct specific preventive measures [ 11 ].…”

Oxidative Modification of Lipoproteins: A Potential Role of Oxidized Small dense LDL in Enhanced Atherogenicity

“…Additional studies also validated that sd-LDL is more atherogenic due to its higher degree of penetration of the arterial wall, long plasma halflife, lesser binding affinity for LDL-R and reduced resistance to oxidative stress when related with large buoyant LDL [59,36]. Since, sd-LDL particles have low antioxidant content and cholesterol level, and increased PUFA and apoB content, they are known to be more prone to lipooxidative modification [66,67]. Toft-Petersen et al [68] demonstrated that the quantity of sd-LDL was a robust univariate analyst of substantial coronary artery stenosis evaluated by both coronary angiography and non-invasive CT scanning methods.…”