Collected Works 2009
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-01742-1_10
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Small denominators. I. Mapping of the circumference onto itself

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The Diophantine class is crucial in the study of quasiperiodic behavior, for example in [8,9]. In equation ( 6) is central to Arnold's study of small denominators in [10].…”
Section: Diophantine Rotationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The Diophantine class is crucial in the study of quasiperiodic behavior, for example in [8,9]. In equation ( 6) is central to Arnold's study of small denominators in [10].…”
Section: Diophantine Rotationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since f is a C M -function, differentiating it M times gives |a k | C f ,M k −M , for each k ∈ Z d 0 for some C f ,M > 0 that depends only on f and M. In equation (10) gives…”
Section: Lemma 32 (Poisson Summation Formula [23]) For Eachmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We now describe an example [32][33][34] of a two-dimensional quasiperiodic torus map on T 2 . This is a two-dimensional version of Arnold's family of one-dimensional maps (see [35]). The map is given by (T 1 , T 2 ) where…”
Section: A Two-dimensional Torus Mapmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Suppose we wish to compute the Fourier coefficients of f and determine how accurate the result is. The computed kth coefficient, denoted âk is â|k| = â±k = WB N ( f (θ)e ±2πik•θ ) = m a m ψ N,m±k (35) which has significant contributions from m ± k = 0 and |m ± k| = k * . Since k * 1, we can ignore a ±k , and we conclude that for small integers n, â|k * ±n| ≈ a |n| ψ N,k * .…”
Section: 23mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, the authors in [33] claimed that the coupling strength for entanglement to exist in steady state must be larger than a critical value. Consequently, the entanglement tongue appears, which is the quantum analog of the Arnold tongue [5]. Finally, we refer the reader to [41] in which the authors showed that synchronization and entanglement in quantum regime can be induced simultaneously in the presence of a random network, and [58] for giving a hint of a common mechanism between classical synchronization and quantum entanglement.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%