2022
DOI: 10.3934/ipi.2021056
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Small defects reconstruction in waveguides from multifrequency one-side scattering data

Abstract: <p style='text-indent:20px;'>Localization and reconstruction of small defects in acoustic or electromagnetic waveguides is of crucial interest in nondestructive evaluation of structures. The aim of this work is to present a new multi-frequency inversion method to reconstruct small defects in a 2D waveguide. Given one-side multi-frequency wave field measurements of propagating modes, we use a Born approximation to provide a <inline-formula><tex-math id="M1">\begin{document}$ \text{L}^2 $\end{d… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
32
0
1

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

3
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(34 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
1
32
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…If Ω is a regular waveguide, we find the same expression for the wave field as in [17]. We also see that the behavior of propagative and evanescent modes in a perturbed waveguide is similar to that in a regular waveguide.…”
Section: Remarksupporting
confidence: 69%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…If Ω is a regular waveguide, we find the same expression for the wave field as in [17]. We also see that the behavior of propagative and evanescent modes in a perturbed waveguide is similar to that in a regular waveguide.…”
Section: Remarksupporting
confidence: 69%
“…Source f . This proof is an adaptation of the proof presented in Appendix B of [17]. Using the results on the modal decomposition presented in Appendix A of [17], we know that the equation ( 50) is equivalent to Here, the relative L 2 error between u and u app is 7.73%.…”
Section: Appendix a Proofs Of Proposition 1 Andmentioning
confidence: 82%
See 3 more Smart Citations