2014
DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.2500783
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Small Business Tax Policy, Informality, and Tax Evasion Evidence from Georgia

Abstract: Using a panel of administrative data and regression discontinuity analysis, this paper examines how the introduction of preferential tax regimes for Georgian micro and small businesses in 2010 affects formal firm creation and tax compliance. The results show that the new tax regime for micro businesses increased the number of newly registered formal firms by 18-30 percent below the eligibility threshold during the first year of the reform, but not in subsequent years. The analysis does not find an effect of th… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
1
1

Relationship

1
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In order for governments in developing countries to reap any meaningful enlarged revenues from this sector, they have to equally invest into it and nurture it. There is a great potential to grow the contribution of the informal sector to revenue mobilisation and economic growth if necessary institutional support is availed to them to foster their productive capacity (Bruhn and Loeprick, 2014;Bruhn and McKenzie, 2014). An enhanced tax base can only become a reality when governments start supporting the productive capabilities of IS activities through innovative formalisation activities that also address the growth constraints faced by the sector (Arosanyin et al, 2009;Gerxhani, 2004).…”
Section: Informal Sector Taxation and Revenue Mobilisationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In order for governments in developing countries to reap any meaningful enlarged revenues from this sector, they have to equally invest into it and nurture it. There is a great potential to grow the contribution of the informal sector to revenue mobilisation and economic growth if necessary institutional support is availed to them to foster their productive capacity (Bruhn and Loeprick, 2014;Bruhn and McKenzie, 2014). An enhanced tax base can only become a reality when governments start supporting the productive capabilities of IS activities through innovative formalisation activities that also address the growth constraints faced by the sector (Arosanyin et al, 2009;Gerxhani, 2004).…”
Section: Informal Sector Taxation and Revenue Mobilisationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the case of Georgia, which exempted micro businesses from taxation, initial assessments of taxpayer behavior following the reform suggest that a noticeable downward migration of small businesses did not occur (Bruhn and Loeprick 2014). Downward migration is thus not a given, provided that the micro threshold is sufficiently low, while effective compliance management covers the segment, and the small business regime is operated reasonably well.…”
Section: Abuse Risks Of Micro Regimesmentioning
confidence: 99%