2019
DOI: 10.1080/03610918.2019.1588308
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Small area estimation combining data from two surveys

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 24 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These improvements were obtained because of the correlations of the target variables [10]. Thus, multivariate EBLUP under the MFH model is the best reliable, efficient, and precise for all target variables stunting, wasting, and underweight [8,10,44,45]. Multivariate small area estimates improve the univariate small area estimates and direct survey estimates due to the correlations among the target variables.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…These improvements were obtained because of the correlations of the target variables [10]. Thus, multivariate EBLUP under the MFH model is the best reliable, efficient, and precise for all target variables stunting, wasting, and underweight [8,10,44,45]. Multivariate small area estimates improve the univariate small area estimates and direct survey estimates due to the correlations among the target variables.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 95%