2007
DOI: 10.1134/s1063774507020034
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Small-angle X-ray scattering study of the structure of powder fullerene C60 and fullerene soot

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These traits encourage extension of the study on one hand to larger R systems, keeping P’s size generally larger than R by one extra ring of hexagons. On the other hand, the size of both R and P is kept rather limited, for obvious practical reasons, but also keeping in mind the available data on the observed dimensions of crystallites. …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…These traits encourage extension of the study on one hand to larger R systems, keeping P’s size generally larger than R by one extra ring of hexagons. On the other hand, the size of both R and P is kept rather limited, for obvious practical reasons, but also keeping in mind the available data on the observed dimensions of crystallites. …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the other hand, the size of both R and P is kept rather limited, for obvious practical reasons, but also keeping in mind the available data on the observed dimensions of crystallites. [5][6][7][8] (2) ΔE R:P (R), directly divided by the number of carbons contained in R, provides a value "per C atom", ΔE C (R). One can consider that the most important part of the interaction comes from those parts of the two molecules that are directly superimposed, so that this major component of interaction can approximately be seen as "perpendicular" to the (approximate) molecular planes.…”
Section: Articlementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Conversely, Figure b suggests that pure vdW π–π association, as in the complexes, is unfavored, unless the interacting molecules or portions of soot lamellae were bearing quite large π systems. If we focus on crystallites and recall Frenklach’s results, the necessity of definitely large PAH sizes to ensure some stability to a pure vdW complex seems in contrast with available experimental evidence on the limited size of such “graphitic domains” . It seems thus legitimate to suggest that the observed crystallites, which are small, are not held together by pure van der Waals interactions: when stackings are observed, these arrangements would have been made accessible to the local systems, on cooling, by previous chemical bond formation.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…where d -the participle diameter, nm; β -the width of X-ray maximum at half-height; λ -the wavelength of radiation, nm; k -some coefficient, which is considered to be ≈1 [13].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%