Small-Angle Muon and Bottom-Quark Production in<mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">p</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mover><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">p</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mi>¯</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mover></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:math>Collisions at<mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><mml:mi>√</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">s</mml:mi><mml:mspace /><mml:mo>=</mml:mo>

Abbott, B.; Abolins, M.; Abramov, V.; Acharya, B. S.; Адам, И.; Adams, D. L.; Adams, M. R.; Ahn, S.; Akimov, V.; Alves, G. A.; Amos, N.; Anderson, E. W.; Baarmand, M. M.; Babintsev, V.; Babukhadia, L.; Baden, A.; Baldin, B.; Banerjee, S.; Bantly, J.; Barberis, E.; Baringer, P.; Bartlett, J. F.; Belyaev, A.; Beri, S. B.; Bertram, I.; Bezzubov, V. A.; Bhat, P. C.; Bhatnagar, V.; Bhattacharjee, M.; Blazey, G.; Blessing, S.; Bloom, P. C.; Boehnlein, A.; Bojko, N. I.; Borcherding, F.; Boswell, C.; Brandt, A.; Breedon, R.; Briskin, G.; Brock, R.; Bross, A.; Buchholz, D.; Буртовой, В. С.; Butler, J. M.; Carvalho, W.; Casey, D.; Casilum, Z.; Castilla‐Valdez, H.; Chakraborty, D.; Chan, K. M.; Chekulaev, S. V.; Chen, W.; Cho, D. K.; Choi, S.; Chopra, S.; Choudhary, B. C.; Christenson, J. H.; Chung, M.; Claes, D. R.; Clark, A.; Cobau, W. G.; Cochran, J.; Coney, L.; Cooper, W. E.; Coppage, D.; Cretsinger, C.; Cullen-Vidal, D.; Cummings, M. A.C.; Ćutts, D.; Dahl, O. I.; Davis, K.; De, K.; Signore, K. Del; Demarteau, M.; Denisov, D.; Denisov, S. P.; Diehl, H. T.; Diesburg, M.; Loreto, G. Di; Draper, P.; Ducros, Y.; Dudko, L.; Dugad, S.; Dyshkant, A.; Edmunds, D.; Ellison, J.; Elvira, V. D.; Engelmann, R.; Eno, S. C.; Eppley, G.; Ermolov, P.; Eroshin, O. V.; Estrada, J.; Evans, H.; Евдокимов, В. Н.; Fahland, T.; Fatyga, M.; Fehér, S.; Fein, D.; Ferbel, T.; Fisk, H. E.; Fisyak, Y.; Flattum, E.; Forden, G. E.; Fortner, M.; Frame, K. C.; Fuess, S.; Gallas, E. J.; Galyaev, A. N.; Gartung, P.; Gavrilov, V.; Geld, T. L.; Genik, R. J.; Genser, K.; Gerber, C. E.; Gershtein, Y.; Gibbard, B.; Ginther, G.; Gobbi, B.; Gómez, B.; Gómez, G.; Goncharov, P. I.; Solís, J. L. González; Gordon, H. A.; Goss, L. T.; Gounder, K.; Goussiou, A. G.; Graf, N.; Grannis, P. D.; Green, D. R.; Green, J. A.; Greenlee, H.; Grinstein, S.; Grudberg, P.; Grünendahl, S.; Guglielmo, G.; Guida, J. A.; Guida, J. M.; Gupta, Abhinav; Gurzhiev, S. N.; Gutiérrez, G.; Gutiérrez, P.; Hadley, N. J.; Haggerty, H.; Hagopian, S.; Hagopian, V.; Hahn, K. S.; Hall, R. E.; Hanlet, P.; Hansen, S.; Hauptman, J. M.; Hays, C. P.; Hébert, C.; Hedin, D.; Heinson, A. P.; Heintz, U.; Hernández-Montoya, R.; Heuring, T.; Hirosky, R.; Hobbs, J.; Hoeneisen, B.; Hoftun, J. S.; Hsieh, F.; Tong, Hui; Ito, A. S.; Jerger, S. A.; Jesik, R.; Joffe–Minor, T.; Johns, K. A.; Johnson, Mark D.; Jonckheere, A.; Jones, M.; Jöstlein, H.; Jun, S. Y.; Kahn, S.; Karmanov, D.; Karmgard, D. J.; Kehoe, R.; Kim, S. K.; Klima, B.; Klopfenstein, C.; Knuteson, B.; Ko, W.; Kohli, J. M.; Koltick, D.; Kostritskiy, A. V.; Kotcher, J.; Kotwal, A.; Kozelov, A. V.; Kozlovsky, E. A.; Krane, J.; Krishnaswamy, M. R.; Krzywdziński, S.; Kubantsev, M.; Kuleshov, S.; Kulik, Y.; Kunori, S.; Landry, F.; Landsberg, G.; Leflat, A.; Li, J.; Li, Q. Z.; Lima, J. G.R.; Lincoln, D.; Linn, S.; Linnemann, J.; Lipton, R.; Lu, J.; Lucotte, A.; Lueking, L.; Maciel, A. K.A.; Madaras, R. J.; Madden, R.; Magaña-Mendoza, L.; Manankov, V.; Mani, S.; Mao, H. S.; Markeloff, R.; Marshall, T.; Martin, M.; Martin, R.; Mauritz, K. M.; May, B.; Mayorov, A. A.; McCarthy, R. L.; McDonald, John; McKibben, T.; McKinley, J.; McMahon, T.; Melanson, H. L.; Merkin, M.; Merritt, K. W.; Miao, C.; Miettinen, H.; Mincer, A. I.; Mishra, C. S.; Mokhov, N.; Mondal, N. K.; Montgomery, H. E.; Mostafa, M.; Motta, H. da; Nang, F.; Narain, M.; Narasimham, V. S.; Narayanan, A.; Neal, H. A.; Negret, J. P.; Némethy, P.; Norman, D.; Oesch, L.; Oguri, V.; Oshima, N.; Owen, D.; Padley, P.; Para, A.; Parashar, N.; Park, Y. M.; Partridge, R.; Parua, N.; Paterno, M.; Pawlik, B.; Perkins, J.; Peters, Michael; Piegaia, R.; Piekarz, H.; Pischalnikov, Y.; Pope, B. G.; Prosper, H.; Protopopescu, S.; Qian, J.; Quintas, P. Z.; Raja, R.; Rajagopalan, S.; Ramírez, O.; Reay, N. W.; Reucroft, S.; Rijssenbeek, M.; Rockwell, T.; Roco, M.; Rubinov, P.; Ruchti, R.; Rutherfoord, J. P.; Sánchez-Hernández, A.; Santoro, A.; Sawyer, L.; Schamberger, R. D.; Schellman, H.; Sculli, J.; Shabalina, E.; Shaffer, C.; Shankar, H. C.; Shivpuri, R. K.; Shpakov, D.; Shupe, M. A.; Sidwell, R. A.; Singh, H.; Singh, J. B.; Sirotenko, V.; Slattery, P.; Smith, E.; Smith, R. P.; Snihur, R.; Snow, G. R.; Snow, J.; Snyder, S.; Solomon, J.; Song, X.; Sosebee, M.; Sotnikova, N.; Souza, M.; Stanton, N. R.; Steinbrück, G.; Stephens, R. W.; Stevenson, M. L.; Stichelbaut, F.; Stoker, D. P.; Stolin, V.; Stoyanova, D. A.; Strauss, M.; Streets, K.; Strovink, M.; Sznajder, A.; Tamburello, P.; Tarazi, J.; Tartaglia, M.; Thomas, T. L.; Thompson, J.; Toback, D.; Trippe, T. G.; Tuts, P. M.; Vaniev, V.; Varelas, N.; Varnes, E. W.; Volkov, A.; Vorobiev, A. P.; Wahl, H. D.; Warchol, J.; Watts, G.; Wayne, M.; Weerts, H.; White, A. S.; White, J. T.; Wightman, J. A.; Willis, S.; Wimpenny, S.; Wirjawan, J. V.D.; Womersley, J.; Wood, D.; Yamada, R.; Yamin, P.; Yasuda, T.; Yepes, P.; Yip, K.; Yoshikawa, C.; Youssef, S.; Yu, J.; Yu, Y.; Zanabria, M.; Zhou, Z.; Zhu, Z. H.; Zieliński, M.; Ziemińska, D.; Ziemiński, A.; Zutshi, V.; Zverev, E. G.; Zylberstejn, A.

doi:10.1103/physrevlett.84.5478

Cited by 41 publications

(27 citation statements)

References 23 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…We note a significant deviation from the pure back-to-back production, corresponding to ∆φ µµ ≈ π. There is good agreement between the KMS prediction and the experimental data, which shows that for these [101]. The curves are the same as in Fig.…”

Section: Numerical Resultssupporting

confidence: 69%

“…In this section we present the numerical results of our calculations and compare them with B-meson production at D0 [36,101], CDF [38,99,100] and UA1 [110].…”

Section: Numerical Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Here we use the k ⊥ -factorization approach for a more detailed analysis of the experimental data [36,38,[99][100][101]. The analysis also covers the azimuthal correlations between b andb quarks and their decay muons.…”

Section: Main Author N Zotovmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 2 more Smart Citations

Small-x phenomenology – Summary of the 3rd Lund small-x workshop in 2004

et al. 2006

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Section: Numerical Resultssupporting

confidence: 69%

“…In this section we present the numerical results of our calculations and compare them with B-meson production at D0 [36,101], CDF [38,99,100] and UA1 [110].…”

Section: Numerical Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Small-x phenomenology – Summary of the 3rd Lund small-x workshop in 2004

et al. 2006

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…A precise knowledge of charm and bottom quark cross sections and distributions is important in order to assess the accuracy of QCD calculations, but also as a test of theoretical predictions susceptible of being used to estimate backgrounds to new physics searches. This is all the more true since, in the past, early experimental measurements of bottom production at the Fermilab Tevatron seemed to be significantly larger than QCD calculations [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9]. It took a while (see [10,11] for a review) before these discrepancies could be resolved, through improvements in the accuracy of both the experimental measurements [12][13][14] and the theoretical predictions.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Theoretical predictions for charm and bottom production at the LHC

Cacciari

Frixione

Houdeau

et al. 2012

J. High Energ. Phys.

537

649

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

We present predictions for a variety of single-inclusive observables that stem from the production of charm and bottom quark pairs at the 7 TeV LHC. They are obtained within the FONLL semi-analytical framework, and with two "Monte Carlo + NLO" approaches, MC@NLO and POWHEG. Results are given for final states and acceptance cuts that are as close as possible to those used by experimental collaborations and, where feasible, are compared to LHC data.

show abstract

“…At the Tevatron Collider, where the high transverse momentum of the observed B's should also help, the measurements give σ bb too large by a factor at least two. [50,51] The CDF and DZero measurements at the Tevatron are dominantly in the central region of phase space. This will also be true for the LHC experiments ATLAS …”

Section: Bottom Production -Cross Sectionsmentioning

confidence: 99%

The experiment road to the heavier quarks and other heavy objects

Appel¹

2001

AIP Conference Proceedings

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Abstract. After a brief history of heavy quarks, I will discuss charm, bottom, and top quarks in turn. For each one, I discuss its first observation, and then what we have learned about production, hadronization, and decays -and what these have taught us about the underlying physics. I will also point out remaining open issues. For this series of lectures, the charm quark will be emphasized. It is the first of the heavy quarks, and its study is where many of the techniques and issues first appeared. Only very brief mention is made of CP violation in the bottom-quark system since that topic is the subject of a separate series of lectures by Gabriel Lopez. As the three quarks are reviewed, a pattern of techniques and lessons emerges. These are identified, and then briefly considered in the context of anticipated physics signals of the future; e.g., for Higgs and SUSY particles. A BRIEF HISTORY OF HEAVY QUARKS Today's Elementary ParticlesToday's picture of the most elementary particles is composed of six quark types, six lepton types, and four force carriers. The quarks and leptons come in three generations, each generation with a pair of quarks (one with charge + 2/3, and one with charge -1/3) and a pair of leptons (one charged, and one neutral). See Table 1. The quarks and leptons have spin 1/2, and couple variously to the spin 1 force carriers: gluons, photons, and charged and neutral weak bosons (W + , W − , and Z). Unlike the leptons, the quarks appear to come in three varieties, called colors. Perhaps the number of colors is related to the quarks' third-integer charges. Also, quarks never appear in isolation, being permanently confined, for example, in meson and baryon combinations (quark-antiquark and three-quark combinations, respectively).These quark, lepton, and force-carrying particles are the foundation of the socalled Standard Model of particle physics. It is widely and completely accepted by the community. However, it was not always that way. The acceptance of the quark

show abstract

Small-Angle Muon and Bottom-Quark Production inpp¯Collisions at√s=

Cited by 41 publications

References 23 publications

Small-x phenomenology – Summary of the 3rd Lund small-x workshop in 2004

Small-x phenomenology – Summary of the 3rd Lund small-x workshop in 2004

Theoretical predictions for charm and bottom production at the LHC

The experiment road to the heavier quarks and other heavy objects

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About