1985
DOI: 10.1002/pol.1985.180231112
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Small‐angle light scattering from a distribution of spherulite sizes

Abstract: Depolarized small‐angle light scattering from spherulites in semicrystalline polymers gives rise to a characteristic cloverleaf pattern. For scattering from a single spherulite, the position of the maximum in scattered intensity is readily related to the spherulite radius. For a distribution of spherulites, the maximum should be related to some characteristic measure of the distribution. It is shown for a wide variety of distributions that this characteristic radius is a ratio of high moments of the size distr… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

1989
1989
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The values are about double the size observed in AFM. This is expected as the average spherulite size determined by small‐angle light scattering is always larger, as it relates to the ratios of large moments of size distribution, as discussed by Wissler and Crist 14. Additional possible factors could be that either surface regions of the films possess smaller spherulites due to rapid cooling or AFM inaccurately measures the average diameter of the spherulites by not capturing their full diameter.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…The values are about double the size observed in AFM. This is expected as the average spherulite size determined by small‐angle light scattering is always larger, as it relates to the ratios of large moments of size distribution, as discussed by Wissler and Crist 14. Additional possible factors could be that either surface regions of the films possess smaller spherulites due to rapid cooling or AFM inaccurately measures the average diameter of the spherulites by not capturing their full diameter.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…For an assembly of spherulites, the average radius is given by the ratio of the fifth and fourth moment of the size distribution and is shifted toward the larger sized spherulites in the distribution due to their larger scattering power . Also, in case of spherulite truncation, the meaning of the spherulite radius R is lost but it rather defines their size in terms of an average distance r from the nucleus to the spherulite boundary.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The ratio of the distance ( L ) from the center of the pattern to the brightest part of the four “four‐lobed” pattern and the vertical distance ( D ) from the sample to the paper‐receiving screen is the tangent of scattering angle θ m. The average radius ( R ) of the spherulites in the sample can be calculated according to the following formula (Equation 2), where λ is the wavelength of the laser (532 nm). [ 27 ] R=4.09λ4πsinθnormalm2. …”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%