2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.apcata.2015.11.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Slurry phase methanation of carbon monoxide over nanosized Ni–Al2O3 catalysts prepared by microwave-assisted solution combustion

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
22
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 50 publications
0
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The H 2 ‐TPR profiles of the three samples are displayed in Figure ; reduction peaks for Ni 2 O 3 , NiO, and the spinel are evident . According to previous studies, these peaks are assigned to the reduction of surface free NiO (α), weakly interacting surface NiO (β 1 ), strongly interacting surface NiO (β 2 ), and the spinel (γ), respectively . Among the three catalysts, the NiO reduction temperature of Ni/MgAl 2 O 4 is lower than that of Ni/NiAl 2 O 4 and Ni/CaAl 2 O 4 , which indicates that the MgAl 2 O 4 spinel support interacts more weakly with the active metal (Ni) than NiAl 2 O 4 and CaAl 2 O 4 , which leads to significant sintering of the free NiO in Ni/MgAl 2 O 4 .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 84%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The H 2 ‐TPR profiles of the three samples are displayed in Figure ; reduction peaks for Ni 2 O 3 , NiO, and the spinel are evident . According to previous studies, these peaks are assigned to the reduction of surface free NiO (α), weakly interacting surface NiO (β 1 ), strongly interacting surface NiO (β 2 ), and the spinel (γ), respectively . Among the three catalysts, the NiO reduction temperature of Ni/MgAl 2 O 4 is lower than that of Ni/NiAl 2 O 4 and Ni/CaAl 2 O 4 , which indicates that the MgAl 2 O 4 spinel support interacts more weakly with the active metal (Ni) than NiAl 2 O 4 and CaAl 2 O 4 , which leads to significant sintering of the free NiO in Ni/MgAl 2 O 4 .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 84%
“…[28] Accordingt op reviouss tudies, these peaks are assigned to the reduction of surface free NiO (a), weaklyi nteracting surface NiO (b 1 ), strongly interacting surface NiO (b 2 ), and the spinel (g), respectively. [29,30] Figure 4. In all cases,C H 4 and CO 2 were converted into H 2 andC Ow ith time-on-stream.…”
Section: Characterization Of Supports and Catalystsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The turnover frequency (TOF) value of the samples was a key dependent variable for the catalytic performance, as shown in Figure 1c. From the results, the TOF of Ni/MgAl-LDO (FNP) was considerably greater than Ni/MgAl-LDO (CP) [23,24], and the highest TOF value was obtained at 350 • C of about 0.14 s −1 . From Figure 1d, the CH 4 yield of Ni/MgAl-LDO (FNP) reached a maximum value at 350 • C of about 79.6%.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Microstructure analysis indicated that the development of a stable combustion and a relative low combustion temperature resulted in the impressively high BET area (256.2 m 2 g −1 ) and metal surface area (34.6 m 2 g −1 ) and the smallest Ni particle size of Ni–Al catalysts. Due to the minimum Ni particle size, highly dispersive active Ni species on support and high stability of support, the urea‐derived catalysts exhibited improved anti‐sintering properties during 200 h lifetime test, enhanced conversion of CO (95.7%), and selectivity for CH 4 (96.2%) …”
Section: Hydrogenation–methanation Reactionsmentioning
confidence: 99%