1977
DOI: 10.4095/301966
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Slurry hydrocracking process for heavy oils using iron-coal catalyst

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

1989
1989
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The iron-based catalyst was selected for the reaction to avoid the excessive hydrogenation that would be provided by the molybdate catalysts promoted by either Ni or Co, supported on γ-alumina, zeolites, silica, or silica–aluminates, which are conventionally used during hydroprocessing . In the patent by Ranganathan et al, the iron sulfate catalyst, in concentrations of 0.1–5 wt %, showed very mild activity toward hydrodesulfurization and hydrocracking but appeared to be extremely effective as a coke suppressor.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The iron-based catalyst was selected for the reaction to avoid the excessive hydrogenation that would be provided by the molybdate catalysts promoted by either Ni or Co, supported on γ-alumina, zeolites, silica, or silica–aluminates, which are conventionally used during hydroprocessing . In the patent by Ranganathan et al, the iron sulfate catalyst, in concentrations of 0.1–5 wt %, showed very mild activity toward hydrodesulfurization and hydrocracking but appeared to be extremely effective as a coke suppressor.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some of the advantages of this approach are mild operating conditions, high liquid product yield and significant improvement in the liquid product properties. Most of the research has focused on using low cost coal additives in the presence of hydrogen (Menzies et al, 1981;Monier 1984; Ranganathan et al, 1980;Speight, 1986). Investigators at CANMET (Menzies et al 1981; Ranganathan et al, 1980) have developed a process which employs a disposable coal additive (pulverized coal impregnated with iron sulfate) and hydrogen at elevated temperature and moderate $Present address: Resources Technology Division, Saskatchewan Research *Author to whom all correspondence should be addressed.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This CANMET process has reported conversions exceeding 80 % with negligible production of coke in the reactor. Fouda et al (1989), Moschopedis and Speight (1982), Ranganathan et al (1980), and Speight (1986) have done extensive "coprocessing" studies with Athabasca oil sand bitumen, Lloydminster heavy oil and Suncor coker gas oil with Alberta bituminous and subbituminous coals. These "coprocessing" studies can be classified in two categories: some that used coal as an additive to process the oil and others that used large concentrations of coal to process the coal.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…CANMET investigators have carried out studies related to hydrocracking of heavy crudes using low concentrations of coal in the feed (Ranganathan et al 1980 andPruden, 1982). In the CANMET process, a low cost additive consisting of pulverized coal impregnated with metal (usually iron sulfate) is used.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%