2013
DOI: 10.1002/14651858.cd010067.pub2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Slum upgrading strategies involving physical environment and infrastructure interventions and their effects on health and socio-economic outcomes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
88
0
2

Year Published

2014
2014
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 110 publications
(91 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
1
88
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The present review is designed to provide this information and complement previous reviews focusing on specific interventions such as infrastructural interventions or housing improvement in slums and their impact on health (Thomson et al 2013, Turley et al 2013.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The present review is designed to provide this information and complement previous reviews focusing on specific interventions such as infrastructural interventions or housing improvement in slums and their impact on health (Thomson et al 2013, Turley et al 2013.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These reviews vary in terms of their complexity (see Table 2). From 24 reviews in this group, 16 only included randomized trials (10 of these restricted the study design to the RCTs in the inclusion criteria), whereas the rest contained a mixture of randomized, quasi-randomized, and/or nonrandomized studies, such as controlled before-after designs [47,50,51], interrupted time series analysis [50], and cross-sectional studies with controls and matched historical controls [8,48]. In this group, three reviews opted out entirely from quantitative synthesis of the effect estimates [42,50,51], whereas six reviews partially meta-analyzed data for several outcomes [35,42e44,47e49].…”
Section: Description Of Included Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…None of the reviews that did not adopt GRADE gave a reason for that decision. In comparison with GRADEendorsed reviews, a higher proportion of those not endorsing GRADE in both complex and simple intervention review groups reported either the narrative synthesis of the data [42,50,51,61,62] or the quantitative synthesis applied to only part of the included outcomes [8,35,43,44,47e49,68].…”
Section: Grade Ratings For Separate Outcomesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations