“…As the "Third Face of Mumbai", to quote one tour document, attention is turned away from a city pushing hard to promote itself as 'world class' but also associated with the abject poverty of pavement dwellers, street children and beggars. Tours, of course, retain the negativity associated with slums, the pre-cognate ideas of dirt and suffering, as the logic for the tours themselves and the need for development projects that are funded in some cases by them (Dyson, 2012). But, some authors point to the political and social potency of tours, a means to contest the aspirational drives of the entrepreneurial city, a means to disrupt the urban experience rendered through the competing spectacle of mega-homes and movie stars.…”