2018
DOI: 10.1007/s11696-018-0522-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Slug formation mechanism for air–water system in T-junction microchannel: a numerical investigation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Various investigations have been conducted to study the dynamics of gas bubble generation process in Taylor flow (Garstecki et al, 2006;De Menech et al, 2008;Abate et al, 2012;Zhang et al, 2015;Soh et al, 2016;Nekouei and Vanapalli, 2017;Khan et al, 2018). Garstecki et al (2006) demonstrated that the gas bubble formation for Taylor flow in T-junction microchannel is controlled by the blockingsqueezing mechanism at low capillary number (Ca < 10 -2 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Various investigations have been conducted to study the dynamics of gas bubble generation process in Taylor flow (Garstecki et al, 2006;De Menech et al, 2008;Abate et al, 2012;Zhang et al, 2015;Soh et al, 2016;Nekouei and Vanapalli, 2017;Khan et al, 2018). Garstecki et al (2006) demonstrated that the gas bubble formation for Taylor flow in T-junction microchannel is controlled by the blockingsqueezing mechanism at low capillary number (Ca < 10 -2 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nekouei and Vanapalli (2017) had also employed simulations based on VOF method for the investigation of the effect of viscosity ratio (dispersed phase to continuous phase) on the dispersed drop size, and reach the conclusion that there is only strong dependency when the ratio is more than 1. Similarly with VOF method, Khan et al (2018) discovered that the pressure drop across the gas bubble during the squeezing process is affected by the flow velocity, wall contact angle and surface tension, which in turn affect the generated bubble size.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…There are numerous studies available in literature related to the hydrodynamics of microfluidic devices [2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9] for different fluids. Kashid and Agar [1] performed experiments in a capillary having a wettability-based flow splitter and found liquidliquid slug flow.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Khan et al [9] performed simulations using a gas-liquid two-phase flow system in rectangular microchannels of 1 mm hydraulic diameter and concluded that the contact angle is one of the key parameters to affect the flow behavior and wettability. Kishor et al [8] also reported different flow regimes including slug flow and determined an empirical correlation for pressure drop.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%