2004
DOI: 10.2166/wst.2004.0505
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sludge thickening performance of mesh filtration process

Abstract: Small-scale wastewater treatment facilities play an important role in improving the aquatic environment in many countries. Although sludge treatment is essential for overall wastewater treatment, it is difficult for small-scale facilities to use mechanical equipment or other facilities. As the first step of the sludge treatment, it is important to develop a convenient sludge thickening process for small-scale facilities. In this work, we examined the sludge thickening performance of a mesh filtration system: t… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This is because the settlement of waste activated sludge is relatively slow and gas emitted from activated sludge during thickening process may adversely affect sludge settling (Lang, 2005). On the other hand, comparing to other thickening methods, gravity thickening is more economical and easy to operate, although usually the effluent suspended solid is relatively high (Park et al, 2004).…”
Section: Sludge Thickeningmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This is because the settlement of waste activated sludge is relatively slow and gas emitted from activated sludge during thickening process may adversely affect sludge settling (Lang, 2005). On the other hand, comparing to other thickening methods, gravity thickening is more economical and easy to operate, although usually the effluent suspended solid is relatively high (Park et al, 2004).…”
Section: Sludge Thickeningmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In other instances, Park et al (2004) utilized mesh filtration with pore sizes of 100 to 500 μm for thickening and achieved a 85-95% of sludge volume reduction, despite that thickening was very fast in the beginning, and slowed down as solids clogged the surface of mesh. In order to minimize P release during sludge thickening, pre-aeration and a combination of linear screen and belt press were introduced by Pitman et al (1991).…”
Section: Sludge Thickeningmentioning
confidence: 99%