2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.01.080
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sludge footprints of municipal treatment plant for the management of net useful energy generation beyond energy neutrality

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

3
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 46 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It is interesting to note that 24% to 48% of COD (i.e., an average of 60% of COD removed) was converted into sludge; however, 19% to 50% of the sludge — an average of 35% — escaped the settler into the next B stage, which basically operated as an activated sludge process with an inflow of particulate substrate and active biomass 22 . Thus, the observed sludge/energy recovery in the A stage was reduced to 44%, which is lower than what can be achieved in most conventional activated sludge configurations 5,23 . The results summarized in Table 3 provide a clear indication that the main bottleneck of the A process is sustaining the presumed high biomass/COD recovery, mainly due to the fragile nature of the flocs.…”
Section: The a Processmentioning
confidence: 89%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…It is interesting to note that 24% to 48% of COD (i.e., an average of 60% of COD removed) was converted into sludge; however, 19% to 50% of the sludge — an average of 35% — escaped the settler into the next B stage, which basically operated as an activated sludge process with an inflow of particulate substrate and active biomass 22 . Thus, the observed sludge/energy recovery in the A stage was reduced to 44%, which is lower than what can be achieved in most conventional activated sludge configurations 5,23 . The results summarized in Table 3 provide a clear indication that the main bottleneck of the A process is sustaining the presumed high biomass/COD recovery, mainly due to the fragile nature of the flocs.…”
Section: The a Processmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…In a study that should be considered a major milestone, Pearson 3 introduced the sludge age, θ X (sludge retention time, SRT), defining the culture history and the net growth rate of biomass sustained in the system; Jenkins and Garrison 4 confirmed the relevance of the sludge age as a major parameter for biomass activity for the design and operation of activated sludge systems. A recent study used a sludge age threshold of 2.0 days, defining SFAS operation below a θ X level of 2.0 days, which would be differentiated from the high rate activated sludge process sustained at a θ X range of 3.0–4.0 days 5 …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…A recent study evaluated the sludge footprints of different activated sludge configurations to visualize the corresponding potential of energy conservation in generated sludge . The concept of sludge footprint was used not only to create a data base for the estimation of the energy conservation potential of domestic sewage treatment, but also for effective management of energy recovery.…”
Section: Reshaping the Processmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…During the treatment of wastewater in the activated sludge system, a huge amount of organic biomass in the form of waste‐activated sludge (WAS) is generated (Sahinkaya, 2015). The energy associated with WAS can be efficiently captured through the biomethanation process while employing suitable physicochemical and mechanical pretreatment techniques (Perendeci et al., 2020; Sözen et al., 2019).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%