2011
DOI: 10.1021/cg101375j
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

SLS Crystallization Platform at Beamline X06DA—A Fully Automated Pipeline Enabling in Situ X-ray Diffraction Screening

Abstract: Crystal Growth & DesignCOMMUNICATION together with the beamline automation at X06DA, this is a clear step toward a much more streamlined and successful work-flow in macromolecular crystallography, eliminating significant bottlenecks in the process.' ASSOCIATED CONTENT b S Supporting Information. Movie showing the workflow and isXds at the SLS crystallization platform at beamline X06DA. This material is available free of charge via the Internet at http:// pubs.acs.org.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
76
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 92 publications
(76 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
(41 reference statements)
0
76
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In particular, COC has seen widespread adoption as the polymer film of choice for X-ray compatible devices, 46 including simple channel structures for counterdiffusion, 56,58,60,61,126 droplet-based devices, 108,109,118 and larger-scale X-ray compatible wellplates. [127][128][129][130][131][132][133][134][135][136][137][138][139][140] However, further decreasing the device thickness to achieve the signal-to-noise levels required for microcrystallography is a significant materials' challenge. Typical reports of X-ray compatible microfluidics describe results where the path length of the device materials is nearly twice that of the crystal of interest.…”
Section: B Device Materials For Microcrystallographymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In particular, COC has seen widespread adoption as the polymer film of choice for X-ray compatible devices, 46 including simple channel structures for counterdiffusion, 56,58,60,61,126 droplet-based devices, 108,109,118 and larger-scale X-ray compatible wellplates. [127][128][129][130][131][132][133][134][135][136][137][138][139][140] However, further decreasing the device thickness to achieve the signal-to-noise levels required for microcrystallography is a significant materials' challenge. Typical reports of X-ray compatible microfluidics describe results where the path length of the device materials is nearly twice that of the crystal of interest.…”
Section: B Device Materials For Microcrystallographymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As the data collected at room temperature is free of artefacts from handling, cryo-protectants and from the cooling process itself, in situ data collection can provide a rapid means of optimising crystallisation conditions. The first implementations used a six-axis robotic arm with a gripper for SBS format crystallization plates to position and rotate the plates in the X-ray beam (Jacquamet, Ohana, Joly, Borel , et al , 2004), while more recent implementations have incorporated dedicated goniometry into the endstation (Bingel-Erlenmeyer et al , 2011, le Maire et al , 2011, Axford et al , 2012). Crystallisation plates have also evolved to facilitate X-ray data collection, with plates designed to minimise background scatter and maximise the accessible rotation range becoming commercially available.…”
Section: Endstation and Experimentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In recent years there has been a resurgence in room temperature (RT) crystallography at synchrotron sources with facilities for in situ data collection developed at a number of sources (Jacquamet, Ohana, Joly, Legrand , et al , 2004, Bingel-Erlenmeyer et al , 2011, Axford et al , 2012). Data collection from crystals held in a crystallisation tray means the potentially damaging steps of crystal harvesting and the cryo-cooling process can be sidestepped.…”
Section: Endstation and Experimentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The FIP beamline at the ESRF was the first to offer access to automated in situ modes and to integrate 6-axis robotic arms that are now widely used for plate-screening at many synchrotrons (Jacquamet et al, 2004). Later, X06DA at the Swiss Light Source was expressly conceived as an automated in situ screening facility with an integrated crystallisation platform (Bingel-Erlenmeyer et al, 2011). I24 at Diamond has since laid much of the ground-work for in situ diffraction using micro-beams and has firmly established this technique for membrane protein crystallography (Axford et al, 2012).…”
Section: In Situ Diffraction and Microfluidicsmentioning
confidence: 99%