2019
DOI: 10.4171/pm/2021
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Slowly non-dissipative equations with oscillating growth

Abstract: The goal of this paper is to construct explicitly the global attractors of semilinear parabolic equations when the reaction term has an oscillating growth. In this case, solution can also grow-up, and hence the attractor is unbounded and induces a flow at infinity. In particular, we construct heteroclinic connections between bounded and/or unbounded hyperbolic equilibria when the reaction term is asymptotically linear.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…I − P)S(s)u 0 − (P S(s)u 0 ) ≤ M u 0 + 3MC f γ 2 e −δs for s ≥ 0, and in consequence for every B ∈ B(X ) there exists a constant C(B) > 0 such that dist (S(s)B, graph ) ≤ C(B)e −δs .Proof By(21) then there exists δ > 0 such thatξ(t) ≤ M ξ(τ ) e −δ(t−τ ) for t ≥ τ.By the definition of ξ(•) we deduce(I − P)v(t) − * (t, Pv(t)) ≤ M (I − P)v(τ ) − * (τ, Pv(τ )) e −δ(t−τ ) .But, exploring the relation between the function v, the solution of(24), and the solution of the original problem, we obtain(I − P)u(t) − (I − P)u(t) − * (t, Pv(t)) ≤ M (I − P)u(τ ) − (I − P)u(τ ) − * (τ, Pv(τ )) e −δ(t−τ ) . and the bound in the definition of LB(κ) we deduce(I − P)S(t − τ )u(τ ) − (I − P)u(t) − * (t, Pv(t)) ≤ M u(τ ) + 3MC f γ 2 e −δ(t−τ )Take t = 0 and τ = −s for s ≥ 0.…”
mentioning
confidence: 85%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…I − P)S(s)u 0 − (P S(s)u 0 ) ≤ M u 0 + 3MC f γ 2 e −δs for s ≥ 0, and in consequence for every B ∈ B(X ) there exists a constant C(B) > 0 such that dist (S(s)B, graph ) ≤ C(B)e −δs .Proof By(21) then there exists δ > 0 such thatξ(t) ≤ M ξ(τ ) e −δ(t−τ ) for t ≥ τ.By the definition of ξ(•) we deduce(I − P)v(t) − * (t, Pv(t)) ≤ M (I − P)v(τ ) − * (τ, Pv(τ )) e −δ(t−τ ) .But, exploring the relation between the function v, the solution of(24), and the solution of the original problem, we obtain(I − P)u(t) − (I − P)u(t) − * (t, Pv(t)) ≤ M (I − P)u(τ ) − (I − P)u(τ ) − * (τ, Pv(τ )) e −δ(t−τ ) . and the bound in the definition of LB(κ) we deduce(I − P)S(t − τ )u(τ ) − (I − P)u(t) − * (t, Pv(t)) ≤ M u(τ ) + 3MC f γ 2 e −δ(t−τ )Take t = 0 and τ = −s for s ≥ 0.…”
mentioning
confidence: 85%
“…The set I is the maximal invariant set if I = {x ∈ X : there is a global solution γ : R → X through x which is bounded in the past} It is also possible to define another notion, which coincides with the classical concept in the theory of global attractors. Note that in Example 1 I \ I b consists of heteroclinics to infinity as defined by [6], see also [18] and the articles [3,13,21,27].…”
Section: Definitionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations