2012
DOI: 10.3945/ajcn.112.041947
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Slowly and rapidly digestible starchy foods can elicit a similar glycemic response because of differential tissue glucose uptake in healthy men

Abstract: Slower intestinal uptake of glucose from a starchy food product can result in lower postprandial insulin and GIP concentrations, but not necessarily in a lower glycemic response, because of a slower GCR. Even without being able to reduce postprandial glycemia, products with slowly digestible starch can have beneficial long-term effects. These types of starchy products cannot be identified by using the glycemic index and therefore another classification system may be necessary. This trial was registered at cont… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

7
68
3

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 68 publications
(78 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
7
68
3
Order By: Relevance
“…However, the postprandial glycemic response did not differ after consumption of our breads. Although a similar glycemic response does not exclude a difference in in vivo starch digestibility due to possible differences in GCR [33, 34] or EGP, the present study found no pronounced differences in glucose kinetics. The RaE, reflecting intestinal glucose uptake, as well as the GCR and EGP, was similar after KB compared to CB.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 66%
“…However, the postprandial glycemic response did not differ after consumption of our breads. Although a similar glycemic response does not exclude a difference in in vivo starch digestibility due to possible differences in GCR [33, 34] or EGP, the present study found no pronounced differences in glucose kinetics. The RaE, reflecting intestinal glucose uptake, as well as the GCR and EGP, was similar after KB compared to CB.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 66%
“…Commercially available starches are extracted in pure form from a variety of sources, but predominantly corn (Tester et al 2004). The starch fractions RAG, SAG, and RS are interesting parameters to characterize the starches and some studies have been conducted in healthy men in order to analyze the influence of the starch fractions distribution in foods on the glycemic response (Anderson et al 2010;Eelderink et al 2012a;Eelderink et al 2012b). In the present study, the cornstarches did not show large differences in either the starch fractions or the experiments in TIM-1.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 43%
“…Previously published studies with partially comparable designs have also found a link between the slowly digestible fraction of starch and RaE [20,38,39,40]. However, the link between the slowly digestible fraction of starch and the glycemic response is not completely consistent with previously published data.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 50%
“…However, the link between the slowly digestible fraction of starch and the glycemic response is not completely consistent with previously published data. Indeed, two studies from Eelderink et al did not report any significant difference in the glycemic response, even though the products tested differed in both in vitro (SDS level) and in vivo (RaE kinetics) starch digestibility [38,39]. As mentioned previously, different methods of measuring starch digestibility can have a substantial influence on the relative estimate of glycemic potency for a given food, as the methods may not use the same cut-off point to define the slow versus rapid fractions of starch digestibility [41].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%