2021
DOI: 10.36510/learnland.v14i1.1031
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Slowing Down and Digging Deep: Teaching Students to Examine Interview Interaction in Depth

Abstract: Teaching students to become critical consumers of interviews, which often serve as influential sources for learning and interpreting world events, is important in today’s information-rich world. This paper outlines an approach to teaching in-depth interviewing in which students examine excerpts from interviews (e.g., archival collections, oral histories, or media interviews) using the tools of ethnomethodology and conversation analysis to “slow down” and “dig deep” into the social aspects of interviews. Using … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

1
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 26 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Thus, students interview a peer and are interviewed by a peer. Before completing the interview, students listen to a historical interview conducted by Arnold Michaelis (found on the UGA Special Collections Library’s website), analyze the interview for “good” and “bad” interview characteristics, and discuss how they may apply what they have learned to design their interview guides (Herron & Roulston, 2021; Roulston & Herron, 2022). Students use this analysis and the orientations expressed in their chosen methodological paradigm to create an interview guide exploring the experiences of scholar-practitioners in training.…”
Section: Our Inquirymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, students interview a peer and are interviewed by a peer. Before completing the interview, students listen to a historical interview conducted by Arnold Michaelis (found on the UGA Special Collections Library’s website), analyze the interview for “good” and “bad” interview characteristics, and discuss how they may apply what they have learned to design their interview guides (Herron & Roulston, 2021; Roulston & Herron, 2022). Students use this analysis and the orientations expressed in their chosen methodological paradigm to create an interview guide exploring the experiences of scholar-practitioners in training.…”
Section: Our Inquirymentioning
confidence: 99%