1994
DOI: 10.1016/s0140-6736(94)90065-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Slower heterosexual spread of HIV-2 than HIV-1

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

4
158
1
2

Year Published

1995
1995
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 309 publications
(167 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
4
158
1
2
Order By: Relevance
“…There are a number of possible reasons for this: (1) although the confounding effects of CD4 count were controlled for as far as possible, between 20 and 25% of patients were started on ART in the absence of a known CD4 count, and therefore there may be residual confounding by CD4 count that explains some of the difference, (2) the administration of inappropriate ART regimens for HIV-2, (3) poorer ART adherence among HIV-2 patients. The latter two reasons may also explain why HIV-2 patients with severe immune deficiency had higher mortality than severely immune-deficient HIV-1 patients.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…There are a number of possible reasons for this: (1) although the confounding effects of CD4 count were controlled for as far as possible, between 20 and 25% of patients were started on ART in the absence of a known CD4 count, and therefore there may be residual confounding by CD4 count that explains some of the difference, (2) the administration of inappropriate ART regimens for HIV-2, (3) poorer ART adherence among HIV-2 patients. The latter two reasons may also explain why HIV-2 patients with severe immune deficiency had higher mortality than severely immune-deficient HIV-1 patients.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…HIV-1 is more easily trans-mitted, and consequently accounts for the vast majority of global HIV infections; the less transmissible HIV-2 is largely confined to West Africa, where it is thought to have originated. 1,2 As HIV-2 is less pathogenic than HIV-1, HIV-2-infected individuals appear to have a much longer asymptomatic stage, slower progression to AIDS, [3][4][5][6] slower decline in CD4 count 3,7,8 and lower mortality 5,9-11 than patients with HIV-1. Serological reactivity to both HIV-1 and HIV-2 (HIV-1/2) exists, and some evidence suggests that this serological profile has increased over the past decade in areas previously endemic for HIV-2.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Differences in biology and viral load may explain the conflicting trends of HIV-1 and HIV-2 prevalence [10][11][12]. Heterosexual transmission of HIV-2 seems to be less efficient compared to HIV-1 [13,14]. Further, progression to AIDS is slower in HIV-2-than in HIV-1-infected individuals [15][16][17][18][19].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Previous epidemiological and clinical studies have shown that the expected rate of transmission as well as disease progression is substantially lower for HIV-2 compared to HIV-1 [23][24][25][26]. This may be due to virological factors leading to the lower viral load usually accompanying HIV-2 infection [35][36][37][38][39][40], but other factors such as a more efficient immune response against HIV-2 may be involved (or both) (reviewed in [41]).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…HIV-2 differs from HIV-1 regarding some important features: the transmission rate is lower and there is a considerably slower progression from the time of infection to the final stages [23][24][25][26]. The mechanisms behind these differences are not clearly understood.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%