2019
DOI: 10.1523/jneurosci.1212-19.2019
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Slow-Wave Activity in the S1HL Cortex Is Contributed by Different Layer-Specific Field Potential Sources during Development

Abstract: Spontaneous correlated activity in cortical columns is critical for postnatal circuit refinement. We used spatial discrimination techniques to explore the late maturation of synaptic pathways through the laminar distribution of the field potential (FP) generators underlying spontaneous and evoked activities of the S1HL cortex in juvenile (P14–P16) and adult anesthetized rats. Juveniles exhibit an intermittent FP pattern resembling Up/Down states in adults, but with much reduced power and different laminar dist… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

7
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 78 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Recordings were carried out while the animal freely explored a familiar open field (Figures 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6), a novel open field (Figure 6) or a T-maze (Figure 7). Using spatial discrimination techniques to separate LFP sources contributed by different synaptic pathways, based on independent component analysis (ICA, Figure 1—figure supplement 1 ; Benito et al, 2014 ; Fernández-Ruiz and Herreras, 2013 ; Herreras, 2016 ; Herreras et al, 2015 ; Lęski et al, 2010 ; Makarov et al, 2010 ; Makarova et al, 2011 ; Ortuño et al, 2019 ; Schomburg et al, 2014 ), we dissected three robust components in all subjects ( Figure 1 ; Materials and methods). The maximum voltages ( Figure 1b ) and dipoles in the current source density (CSD) depth profiles ( Figure 1c ) of the three components matched the stratified distribution of known terminal fields in the hippocampus and the currents resulting from stimulation of the corresponding pathways, as previously shown ( Benito et al, 2014 ; Fernández-Ruiz and Herreras, 2013 ; Lasztóczi and Klausberger, 2014 ; Schomburg et al, 2014 ).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recordings were carried out while the animal freely explored a familiar open field (Figures 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6), a novel open field (Figure 6) or a T-maze (Figure 7). Using spatial discrimination techniques to separate LFP sources contributed by different synaptic pathways, based on independent component analysis (ICA, Figure 1—figure supplement 1 ; Benito et al, 2014 ; Fernández-Ruiz and Herreras, 2013 ; Herreras, 2016 ; Herreras et al, 2015 ; Lęski et al, 2010 ; Makarov et al, 2010 ; Makarova et al, 2011 ; Ortuño et al, 2019 ; Schomburg et al, 2014 ), we dissected three robust components in all subjects ( Figure 1 ; Materials and methods). The maximum voltages ( Figure 1b ) and dipoles in the current source density (CSD) depth profiles ( Figure 1c ) of the three components matched the stratified distribution of known terminal fields in the hippocampus and the currents resulting from stimulation of the corresponding pathways, as previously shown ( Benito et al, 2014 ; Fernández-Ruiz and Herreras, 2013 ; Lasztóczi and Klausberger, 2014 ; Schomburg et al, 2014 ).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, they may not recover the correct time‐course of each area during ongoing field potentials (Fernández‐Ruiz & Herreras, 2013; Martín‐Vázquez et al, 2013) as, for instance, close generators with uncorrelated activities would cancel the resultant current. BSS methods have been proposed as a powerful methodology to extract the time course associated with different sources, either local or propagated, with promising results in the rat hippocampus and cortex (López‐Madrona et al, 2020; Makarov et al, 2010; Ortuño et al, 2019). Nevertheless, the interpretation of the different components is not straightforward and requires prior knowledge of the brain sources and the geometrical propagation of the fields in order to correctly infer the origin of the components (Herreras et al, 2015).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, it has been proposed as a tool to disentangle deep brain activities hidden at the surface by superficial signals with higher amplitudes [ 37 ]. Although its use in intracranial recordings is reduced in comparison, its effectiveness has been well studied [ 31 , 38 ], and it has been used to dissociate local and remote cortical field potentials [ 39 , 40 ] and different current generators in the hippocampus [ 7 , 16 , 41 , 42 ].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%