2016
DOI: 10.1523/jneurosci.1421-16.2016
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Slow Temporal Integration Enables Robust Neural Coding and Perception of a Cue to Sound Source Location

Abstract: In mammals, localization of sound sources in azimuth depends on sensitivity to interaural differences in sound timing (ITD) and level (ILD). Paradoxically, while typical ILD-sensitive neurons of the auditory brainstem require millisecond synchrony of excitatory and inhibitory inputs for the encoding of ILDs, human and animal behavioral ILD sensitivity is robust to temporal stimulus degradations (e.g., interaural decorrelation due to reverberation), or, in humans, bilateral clinical device processing. Here we d… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
45
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 39 publications
(47 citation statements)
references
References 55 publications
2
45
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Indeed, brain-stem physiology suggests slower ILD integration versus greater transient sensitivity to ITD change (Remme et al, 2014 ). On their own, those differences are too small to account for the differences found here, but may become exaggerated along the auditory pathway (Brown & Tollin, 2016 ). In fact, whereas ITD can only be computed via early brainstem mechanisms with microsecond acuity, ILD cues could be computed de novo via binaural comparisons in slower midbrain and cortical structures that encode sound level via spike rates.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 83%
“…Indeed, brain-stem physiology suggests slower ILD integration versus greater transient sensitivity to ITD change (Remme et al, 2014 ). On their own, those differences are too small to account for the differences found here, but may become exaggerated along the auditory pathway (Brown & Tollin, 2016 ). In fact, whereas ITD can only be computed via early brainstem mechanisms with microsecond acuity, ILD cues could be computed de novo via binaural comparisons in slower midbrain and cortical structures that encode sound level via spike rates.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 83%
“…3 and 4) analyzed as functions of ITD ENV . For each of 25 stimulus presentations of a 300-ms transposed tone, we calculated a JND in ITD ENV for each population of 24 model LSO neurons, based on a method of neuronal JND(IID) calculation (Brown & Tollin, 2016), which we extended to a neuronal population:…”
Section: Neural Just-noticeable Differences (Jnds) In Interaural Timementioning
confidence: 99%
“…For each stimulus repetition and model population, a neural JND (Brown & Tollin, 2016) was calculated as the standard error of the mean spike rate, divided by the derivative of mean spike rate with respect to ITD. Agreement in the algebraic sign of the derivative in at least 19 of the 25 stimulus repetitions was required.…”
Section: Just-noticeable Differences In Itd Env : Humans and Model Lsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, very recent work has used that same front end to study ILD perception. The model proposed by Brown and Tollin (2016) subtracted simulated left and right ear AN spike trains within a running temporal window. This simple model was good enough to validate their physiological and psychophysical observations of ILD sensitivity and robustness.…”
Section: Comparison With Existing Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In order to be able to model this, we would need an additional module that could integrate binaural information across cues. The latter is not a trivial task, since the questions of at what levels of the auditory pathway and to what extent are time and level cues combined are still topics of ongoing research (Brown and Tollin, 2016;Ellinger et al, 2017;Johnson and Hautus, 2010;Palom€ aki et al, 2005;Phillips and Hall, 2005;Takanen et al, 2014).…”
Section: E Framework Limitationsmentioning
confidence: 99%