2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2019.01.012
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Slow spindles are associated with cortical high frequency activity

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

3
31
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(34 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
3
31
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It would be too speculative to make any assumption on specific neocortical and/or neocortical-subcortical network interactions. Moreover, activity of the up-to-down and down-to-up states are not independent, resulting from local activity and long-range neuronal connections as well as from nonneuronal responses [ 35 , 90–94 ]. We suggest that future studies investigate whether information on the interplay of sequential neural circuitry during the falling and rising phase of the SO can be related to so-tDCs efficacy, and that studies confirm ties between baseline sleep and task-dependent so-tDCS efficacy.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It would be too speculative to make any assumption on specific neocortical and/or neocortical-subcortical network interactions. Moreover, activity of the up-to-down and down-to-up states are not independent, resulting from local activity and long-range neuronal connections as well as from nonneuronal responses [ 35 , 90–94 ]. We suggest that future studies investigate whether information on the interplay of sequential neural circuitry during the falling and rising phase of the SO can be related to so-tDCs efficacy, and that studies confirm ties between baseline sleep and task-dependent so-tDCS efficacy.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hashemi et al (2019) recently examined the interrelationship between sleep-spindles activity and higher frequencies (∼25.0 Hz). In their model, the cortical high frequency activity and its interaction with thalamic oscillation at fast spindle are proposed as key mechanism for the generation of slow spindles.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, an exhaustive description of spindles local features is not possible with LORETA algorithm, due to its limited potential for the identification and localization of multiple and concomitant cortical sources (Nir et al, 2011; Piantoni et al, 2017; Hagler et al, 2018). Moreover, LORETA does not take into account co-localized sources, possibly explaining the key role of modulation of cortical spontaneous activity in the genesis of spindle (Hashemi et al, 2019).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It has been hypothesized that the phase of the slower oscillation generally reflects greater excitability among postsynaptic neurons, which in turn synchronizes the synaptic input (as reflected by an increase in the amplitude of the faster oscillation) (Bergmann & Born, 2018). In adults, the mechanisms underlying PAC lead to specific temporal patterns of coupling across multiple frequencies at both local and distal sites (Bergmann & Born, 2018;Engel et al, 2013;Hashemi, Dehnavi, Moghimi, & Ghorbani, 2019;Hyafil et al, 2015).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It has been hypothesized that the phase of the slower oscillation generally reflects greater excitability among postsynaptic neurons, which in turn synchronizes the synaptic input (as reflected by an increase in the amplitude of the faster oscillation) (Bergmann & Born, 2018). In adults, the mechanisms underlying PAC lead to specific temporal patterns of coupling across multiple frequencies at both local and distal sites (Bergmann & Born, 2018; Engel et al, 2013; Hashemi, Dehnavi, Moghimi, & Ghorbani, 2019; Hyafil et al, 2015). This coupling can be modulated by structural changes (Helfrich et al, 2018; Salimpour & Anderson, 2019), and task‐related network dynamics (suggesting a functional role for the CFC) (Canolty & Knight, 2010; Combrisson et al, 2017; Engel et al, 2013; Haegens, Nácher, Luna, Romo, & Jensen, 2011; Tort, Komorowski, Manns, Kopell, & Eichenbaum, 2009).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%