2019
DOI: 10.1029/2018jb016765
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Slow Slip Event On the Southern San Andreas Fault Triggered by the 2017 Mw8.2 Chiapas (Mexico) Earthquake

Abstract: Observations of shallow fault creep reveal increasingly complex time‐dependent slip histories that include quasi‐steady creep and triggered as well as spontaneous accelerated slip events. Here we report a recent slow slip event on the southern San Andreas fault triggered by the 2017 Mw8.2 Chiapas (Mexico) earthquake that occurred 3,000 km away. Geodetic and geologic observations indicate that surface slip on the order of 10 mm occurred on a 40‐km‐long section of the southern San Andreas fault between the Mecca… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
48
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 56 publications
(50 citation statements)
references
References 80 publications
2
48
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Dynamic triggering has been shown to influence the occurrence of earthquakes, aseismic slow earthquakes, tectonic tremors, landslides, and icequakes (Aiken et al., 2013; Gomberg et al., 1997; Gonzalez‐Huizar et al., 2012; H. P. Johnson et al., 2017; Obara, 2002; Peng et al., 2014; Tymofyeyeva et al., 2019; Wallace et al., 2017). Triggered shallow crustal earthquakes occur at a variety of fault systems, including subduction zones, continental plate boundaries, and geothermal fields (Brodsky et al., 2003; Fan & Shearer, 2016; Kaven, 2020; Nissen et al., 2016; Velasco et al., 2008; Yun et al., 2019).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Dynamic triggering has been shown to influence the occurrence of earthquakes, aseismic slow earthquakes, tectonic tremors, landslides, and icequakes (Aiken et al., 2013; Gomberg et al., 1997; Gonzalez‐Huizar et al., 2012; H. P. Johnson et al., 2017; Obara, 2002; Peng et al., 2014; Tymofyeyeva et al., 2019; Wallace et al., 2017). Triggered shallow crustal earthquakes occur at a variety of fault systems, including subduction zones, continental plate boundaries, and geothermal fields (Brodsky et al., 2003; Fan & Shearer, 2016; Kaven, 2020; Nissen et al., 2016; Velasco et al., 2008; Yun et al., 2019).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Stresses of <1 kPa due to deep SSEs and a large earthquake apparently triggered shallow SSEs along the plate interface in Costa Rica (Davis et al, 2015), and co‐seismic static stress changes of ~7 kPa from the M9.0 2011 Tohoku, Japan, earthquake may have initiated an SSE 900 km away along the shallow interface in the Nankai, Japan, subduction zone (Davis et al, 2013). Seismic wave‐generated dynamic stresses triggered SSEs at various depths from the M7.9 2001 Denali, Alaska, earthquake beneath Vancouver Island in the Cascadia subduction zone (40 kPa; Rubinstein et al, 2007); from the M8.8 2001 Maule, Chile, earthquake in the Guerrero segment of the Mexican SZ (~11 kPa; Zigone et al, 2012); and from the M8.2 2017 Chiapas, Mexico, earthquake along the shallow portion of the San Andreas Fault in California (~30 kPa; Tymofyeyeva et al, 2019). Shelly et al (2011) inferred that dynamic stresses from global and regional earthquakes as small as M5.4 triggered SSEs (noted as creep events) that then initiated bursts of tremor and small earthquake activity at 10–30 km depth along the Cholame section of the San Andreas Fault.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One contributing factor to this debate is that, in our chosen geometries, we use a SSAF Coachella strand that has a vertical dip from surface to depth. Recent geophysical observations (Fuis et al, 2017) and modeling efforts that incorporate both GPS and InSAR data sets in this area (Lindsey and Fialko, 2013;Fattaruso et al, 2014;Tymofyeyeva et al, 2019) indicate that the Coachella strand has a more complicated geometry than previously assumed by earlier modeling efforts such as the UCERF3 model and the SCEC CFM models. In particular, these investigations suggest that this strand may be dipping from 50°-70° to the northeast.…”
Section: Research Papermentioning
confidence: 99%