2020
DOI: 10.1103/physrevx.10.011055
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Slow Quantum Thermalization and Many-Body Revivals from Mixed Phase Space

Abstract: Describing the way strongly interacting quantum systems approach thermal equilibrium remains an important open problem. Recent works discovered systems in which thermalization rates may depend very sensitively on the initial conditions, via a mechanism reminiscent of quantum scars in chaotic billiards. While strongly interacting systems do not always have an obvious quasiclassical limit, time-dependent variational principle (TDVP) allows one to project the unitary dynamics onto the matrix-product state manifol… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
102
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 107 publications
(102 citation statements)
references
References 78 publications
(146 reference statements)
0
102
0
Order By: Relevance
“…δ + (2),8 = P P σ + 2n P σ z P P + P P σ z P σ + 2n P P + P P σ − 2n+1 P σ z P P + P P σ z P σ − 2n+1 P P. (43) Putting these terms together, we obtain the second order perturbations,H + 2) . Coefficients optimizing fidelity were found to be: λ * i = [0.11135, 0.000217, −0.000287, −0.00717, (44) 0.00827, 0.00336, 0.00429, 0.0103, 0.00118], (45) where the first value is the optimal coefficient for the first order term Eq. (32), while the remaining coefficients correspond to the terms in order of appearance in Eqs.…”
Section: Example: Pxp Model and Embedded Su(2) Algebramentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…δ + (2),8 = P P σ + 2n P σ z P P + P P σ z P σ + 2n P P + P P σ − 2n+1 P σ z P P + P P σ z P σ − 2n+1 P P. (43) Putting these terms together, we obtain the second order perturbations,H + 2) . Coefficients optimizing fidelity were found to be: λ * i = [0.11135, 0.000217, −0.000287, −0.00717, (44) 0.00827, 0.00336, 0.00429, 0.0103, 0.00118], (45) where the first value is the optimal coefficient for the first order term Eq. (32), while the remaining coefficients correspond to the terms in order of appearance in Eqs.…”
Section: Example: Pxp Model and Embedded Su(2) Algebramentioning
confidence: 99%
“…30,31 While the collection of models that feature scarred-like eigenstates has recently expanded, [32][33][34][35][36][37][38][39][40][41][42][43] a smaller subset of such models have been demonstrated to display revivals from easily preparable initial states. [44][45][46] Thus, the connection between revivals and the presence of atypical eigenstates remains to be fully understood.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…References [22,23] developed a systematic construction to embed nonthermal states in the spectrum. Many other systems or models have also been discovered or constructed to have scars or scarlike physics [24][25][26][27][28][29][30][31][32][33][34][35].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several works investigated the possibility of mimicking similarly localized behavior without explicitly breaking translation invariance [25][26][27][28][29][30][31][32][33], as well as the possibility of intermediate behavior, such as the existence of a small number of ETH-violating eigenstates within an otherwise generic spectrum of states [34][35][36][37][38][39][40][41][42][43][44][45][46][47][48]. Recently, the authors of the present paper, following earlier work on dipole-conserving random circuits [49], identified a novel mechanism for such non-ergodic behavior, dubbed Hilbert space fragmentation [50,51].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%