1990
DOI: 10.1016/0255-2701(90)80008-s
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Slow parallel motion of cylinders in non-Newtonian media: wall effects and drag coefficient

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

1994
1994
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Given the difficulty of an unambiguous description of size, shape and orientation of non-spherical particles, this level of accuracy is regarded to be reasonable and adequate for process engineering design calculations. Reynolds number for a Newtonian fluid (qVd s / l) (-) Re PL power law Reynolds number (qV 2 À n d s n / m (-) V terminal falling velocity of a particle (m/s) Table 2 Summary of experimental data in power law fluids Source Particle shape w n R e PL Unnikrishnan and Chhabra (1990) Vertically falling cylinders 0.6-0.95 0.48-0.6 0.01-1.7 Sharma and Chhabra (1991) Cones 0.64-0.80 0.3-0.85 0.01-36 Venumadhav and Chhabra (1994) Cylinders and prisms 0.33-0.98 0.77-0.96 0.1-140 Tripathi et al (1994) Oblates and prolates 0.62-0.93 0.4-1 0.01-100 Borah and Chhabra (2005) Cones 0 shear rate (s À 1 ) k ratio of surface area to projected area (-) l…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Given the difficulty of an unambiguous description of size, shape and orientation of non-spherical particles, this level of accuracy is regarded to be reasonable and adequate for process engineering design calculations. Reynolds number for a Newtonian fluid (qVd s / l) (-) Re PL power law Reynolds number (qV 2 À n d s n / m (-) V terminal falling velocity of a particle (m/s) Table 2 Summary of experimental data in power law fluids Source Particle shape w n R e PL Unnikrishnan and Chhabra (1990) Vertically falling cylinders 0.6-0.95 0.48-0.6 0.01-1.7 Sharma and Chhabra (1991) Cones 0.64-0.80 0.3-0.85 0.01-36 Venumadhav and Chhabra (1994) Cylinders and prisms 0.33-0.98 0.77-0.96 0.1-140 Tripathi et al (1994) Oblates and prolates 0.62-0.93 0.4-1 0.01-100 Borah and Chhabra (2005) Cones 0 shear rate (s À 1 ) k ratio of surface area to projected area (-) l…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…More recently, vortex shedding characteristics from a circular cylinder in power law fl uids have been studied by Coelho et al (1996) and Pinho (2003a, b, 2004) in the Reynolds number range 50-9000. Finally, while some results on the drag on freely falling non-spherical particles including short cylinders (l/d<∼ 10) in power law fl uids are available in the literature (Machac et al, 2002;Rajitha et al, 2006;Rodrigue et al, 1994;Unnikrishnan and Chhabra, 1990;Venu Madhav and Chhabra, 1994), there are virtually no results available on the cross fl ow of long cylinders. In summary, there is essentially only one numerical study (i.e., Chhabra et al, 2004;Soares et al, 2005) available in which the fl ow of power law fl uids has been examined for three values of the Reynolds number (5, 20 and 40) and for the power law index in the range (0.6 ≤ n ≤ 1.4).…”
Section: Steady Flow Of Power Law Fluids Across a Circular Cylindermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Comparing these experimental result to semiempirical predictions, despite qualitative agreement, the drag coefficient was overestimated by theoretical predictions [43,44]. Comparable studies have also probed wall effects [39,45], different cross sections [46] and interactions between particles [47].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 80%