2015
DOI: 10.1007/s10974-015-9408-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Slow motor units in female rat soleus are slower and weaker than their male counterparts

Abstract: The aim of the study was to investigate sex-related differences in contractile properties, parameters of action potentials, and mechanisms of force regulation of motor units in the rat soleus muscle, which is a frequent experimental model in animal research. It was revealed that the mean mass of the muscle in males was bigger than in females, by approximately 80%. However, the relation of the muscle mass to the body mass was not significantly different. These results correspond to approximately twice as much t… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

1
9
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
1
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The ratios of values of the force and the force-time area for the strongest decomposed twitch to the weakest one were significantly higher for male MUs. The above results well reflect sex differences in the twitch-to-tetanus ratios between male and female soleus MUs, as this parameter has been found to be almost twice lower for males in relation to females (0.11 and 0.19, respectively), while no sex differences have been observed in twitch forces between male and female soleus MUs (Drzymała-Celichowska and Krutki, 2015). This difference suggests that in male soleus MUs, the rate coding plays a bigger role in force regulation processes than in females.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 74%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…The ratios of values of the force and the force-time area for the strongest decomposed twitch to the weakest one were significantly higher for male MUs. The above results well reflect sex differences in the twitch-to-tetanus ratios between male and female soleus MUs, as this parameter has been found to be almost twice lower for males in relation to females (0.11 and 0.19, respectively), while no sex differences have been observed in twitch forces between male and female soleus MUs (Drzymała-Celichowska and Krutki, 2015). This difference suggests that in male soleus MUs, the rate coding plays a bigger role in force regulation processes than in females.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 74%
“…One of the most obvious differences between slow MUs of these two muscles is that the values of the twitch contraction and relaxation times as well as of the twitch force are substantially higher in soleus MUs than in medial gastrocnemius MUs (Drzymała-Celichowska and Krutki, 2015). These differences should be related to differences in the innervation ratio, muscle fiber diameter and density within a MU (Mierzejewska-Krzyżowska et al, 2011) as well as in the architecture of the two muscles -the soleus is a pennate muscle with a smaller pennation angle and shorter muscle fibers (Eng et al, 2008).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In most of physiological studies performed on MUs of cat and rat hindlimb muscles the division of MUs into fast (F) and slow (S) has been based on the sag profile, a rapid increase of tetanic tension followed by a decrease of tension present in unfused tetani of fast units (Burke et al 1973) whereas this phenomenon has never been observed in slow MUs. In previous papers we have revealed that basic contractile properties of MUs in rat soleus muscle are sex-related, and male MUs are faster (Drzymała-Celichowska and Krutki 2015), consistent with higher contents of IIa myosin in the latter (Eason et al 2000. It is known that a substantial portion of diversity of physiological properties can be attributed to the presence of distinct sets of myofibrillar proteins that define general classes of muscle fibers (Pette and Staron 1990, Stephenson et al 1998, Carp et al 1999.…”
mentioning
confidence: 62%