Fracture Mechanics of Ceramics 1974
DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4615-7014-1_14
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Slow Crack Growth in Polycrystalline Ceramics

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

2
15
0

Year Published

1983
1983
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
4
4
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 64 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
2
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The observed crack growth for the alumina/aluminum interface specimens was primarily intergranular in the alumina, and appeared to be identical to that observed in previous studies on moisture assisted crack growth in bulk alumina [60,107]. Initial moisture assisted crack growth in the 5 µm thick layer samples occurred at driving forces lower than for crack growth in fatigue pre-cracked bulk alumina samples.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 83%
“…The observed crack growth for the alumina/aluminum interface specimens was primarily intergranular in the alumina, and appeared to be identical to that observed in previous studies on moisture assisted crack growth in bulk alumina [60,107]. Initial moisture assisted crack growth in the 5 µm thick layer samples occurred at driving forces lower than for crack growth in fatigue pre-cracked bulk alumina samples.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 83%
“…The observed crack growth for the interface specimens was primarily intergranular in the alumina, and appeared to be identical to observed intergranular moisture-assisted crack growth in bulk alumina [27]. Although no interfacial moisture-assisted crack growth was observed, the interface may be nonetheless susceptible to moisture-assisted crack growth under conditions of reduced crack blunting and/or reduced propensity for cracking into the oxide substrate.…”
Section: Moisture-assisted Crack Growth Under Static Loadsupporting
confidence: 65%
“…Many tests have been carried out with the indentation technique (Tobin and Pak 1993;Lynch 1998;Shindo et al 2001;Schneider et al 2003). For many fracture experiments, polarized piezoelectric ceramics have been treated to be isotropic and use was made of purely mechanical calibrations for the stress intensity factor K I (Freiman et al 1974;Bruce et al 1978;McHenry and Koepke 1983;Pohanka et al 1983;Tobin and Pak 1993;Zhang et al 2004). The fracture toughness obtained in this way may be defined as the apparent fracture toughness and is typically referred to as K I c in the literature.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%