2019
DOI: 10.1111/jmg.12485
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Slow cooling versus episodic fluid injections: Deciphering the Caledonian orogeny in Vestvågøy, Lofoten islands, Norway

Abstract: The determination of the thermal (temperature-time) histories of highpressure metamorphic terranes has been commonly based on the concepts of slow cooling and closure temperatures. In this paper, we find that this approach cannot reconcile a geochronological data set obtained from the amphibolite-facies allochthonous Leknes Group of the Lofoten islands, Norway, which reveals an extremely complex thermal history. Using detailed results from several different geochronometers such as 40 Ar/ 39 Ar, Rb-Sr, and U-Pb… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 60 publications
(315 reference statements)
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This substantial volume of fluid infiltration can be achieved either by a continuous supply or by repetitive pulses of fluid infiltration. Such pulses have been proposed for shear zones exposed in Lofoten (northern Norway), where similar crustal rocks were locally transformed into eclogite (Fournier et al., 2019). There, however, viscously deforming shear zones did not widen and are restricted to the width of their precursor (Menegon et al., 2017).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…This substantial volume of fluid infiltration can be achieved either by a continuous supply or by repetitive pulses of fluid infiltration. Such pulses have been proposed for shear zones exposed in Lofoten (northern Norway), where similar crustal rocks were locally transformed into eclogite (Fournier et al., 2019). There, however, viscously deforming shear zones did not widen and are restricted to the width of their precursor (Menegon et al., 2017).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 90%