Slow breathing influences cardiac autonomic responses to postural maneuver

Vidigal, Giovanna de Paula; Tavares, Bruna S.; Garner, David M.; Porto, Andrey Alves; Abreu, Luíz Carlos de; Ferreira, Celso; Valenti, Vítor Engrácia

doi:10.1016/j.ctcp.2015.11.005

Cited by 19 publications

(18 citation statements)

References 32 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…; Vidigal et al . ). Compared to supine rest, standing increased and decreased the normalised LF and HF components, respectively (Task Force, ; Vidigal et al .…”

Section: Autonomic Control Of Heart Ratementioning

confidence: 97%

“…Compared to supine rest, standing increased and decreased the normalised LF and HF components, respectively (Task Force, ; Vidigal et al . ). Accurate HRV analysis performed in healthy volunteers during head‐up tilt with gradual inclination changes showed only moderate heart rate increases but the normalised LF and HF components increased and decreased practically linearly and statistically significantly with the increasing tilt inclination from 0 to 90 deg (Montano et al .…”

Section: Autonomic Control Of Heart Ratementioning

confidence: 97%

See 1 more Smart Citation

CrossTalk proposal: Heart rate variability is a valid measure of cardiac autonomic responsiveness

Malík

Hnatkova

Huikuri

et al. 2019

The Journal of Physiology

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

“…; Vidigal et al . ). Compared to supine rest, standing increased and decreased the normalised LF and HF components, respectively (Task Force, ; Vidigal et al .…”

Section: Autonomic Control Of Heart Ratementioning

confidence: 97%

Section: Autonomic Control Of Heart Ratementioning

confidence: 97%

CrossTalk proposal: Heart rate variability is a valid measure of cardiac autonomic responsiveness

Malík

Hnatkova

Huikuri

et al. 2019

The Journal of Physiology

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

“…In the study by Z hang et al [ 103 ], whilst they observed an increase in vagal power with slow breathing, sympathetic power did not significantly change; however, a change in the pattern of sympathetic bursts within breaths was observed (also reported by K oizumi et al [ 96 ], S eals et al [ 104 ] and L imberg et al [ 106 ]). On a similar note, V idigal et al [ 107 ] conducted an investigation into the effects of slow respiration (6 breaths per min) on autonomic response to postural manoeuvre. Slow breathing improved cardiac sympathetic and parasympathetic responsiveness to physical perturbations, which they suggested may be a result of augmented baroreflex sensitivity due to increased (initial) parasympathetic tone, and synchronisation of sympathetic and parasympathetic systems at 6 breaths per min.…”

Section: Cardiorespiratory Unitmentioning

confidence: 99%

The physiological effects of slow breathing in the healthy human

Russo¹,

Santarelli²,

O’Rourke³

2017

Breathe

397

348

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Slow breathing practices have been adopted in the modern world across the globe due to their claimed health benefits. This has piqued the interest of researchers and clinicians who have initiated investigations into the physiological (and psychological) effects of slow breathing techniques and attempted to uncover the underlying mechanisms. The aim of this article is to provide a comprehensive overview of normal respiratory physiology and the documented physiological effects of slow breathing techniques according to research in healthy humans. The review focuses on the physiological implications to the respiratory, cardiovascular, cardiorespiratory and autonomic nervous systems, with particular focus on diaphragm activity, ventilation efficiency, haemodynamics, heart rate variability, cardiorespiratory coupling, respiratory sinus arrhythmia and sympathovagal balance. The review ends with a brief discussion of the potential clinical implications of slow breathing techniques. This is a topic that warrants further research, understanding and discussion.Key pointsSlow breathing practices have gained popularity in the western world due to their claimed health benefits, yet remain relatively untouched by the medical community.Investigations into the physiological effects of slow breathing have uncovered significant effects on the respiratory, cardiovascular, cardiorespiratory and autonomic nervous systems.Key findings include effects on respiratory muscle activity, ventilation efficiency, chemoreflex and baroreflex sensitivity, heart rate variability, blood flow dynamics, respiratory sinus arrhythmia, cardiorespiratory coupling, and sympathovagal balance.There appears to be potential for use of controlled slow breathing techniques as a means of optimising physiological parameters that appear to be associated with health and longevity, and that may extend to disease states; however, there is a dire need for further research into the area.Educational aimsTo provide a comprehensive overview of normal human respiratory physiology and the documented effects of slow breathing in healthy humans.To review and discuss the evidence and hypotheses regarding the mechanisms underlying slow breathing physiological effects in humans.To provide a definition of slow breathing and what may constitute “autonomically optimised respiration”.To open discussion on the potential clinical implications of slow breathing techniques and the need for further research.

show abstract

“…In the context of fundamental research, the majority of data on cardiovascular and respiratory autonomic patterns is based on the analysis of parameters of HRV linear domain. On the basis of these results, we deduce the antagonism of autonomic effectors on RRI regulation (change of posture, i.e., supine vs. standing, Montano et al, 1994;Levy and Martin, 1996;Jasson et al, 1997) or their synergism of action (i.e., supine vs. standing with slow breathing, de Paula Vidigal et al, 2016). These interrelated patterns of sympathetic vs. parasympathetic activity on RRI regulation are not confirmed for non-linear domain dynamics (Sassi et al, 2015).…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 74%

“…Also, the research on the orthostasis effect on HRV has been well-documented (De Souza et al, 2014;Zaidi and Collins, 2016;Valente et al, 2018) and is routinely used as a sensitive test for the evaluation of "physiological adaptive mechanisms" generated by the autonomic nervous system (head up tilt, Zygmunt and Stanczyk, 2010;Hoshi et al, 2019). Most of the studies that evaluate HRV in these physiological conditions (supine position, standing, supine position with 0.1 Hz breathing and standing with 0.1 Hz) focused on linear properties of HRV (Kabir et al, 2011;de Paula Vidigal et al, 2016;Javorka et al, 2018;Jha et al, 2018). However, non-linear properties quantify and explain up to 80% of total RRI variability (Vandeput, 2010) and reflect physiological mechanisms of multiinteracting cardiovascular control, mostly exerted through sympatho-vagal effectors operating in nonlinear fashion (de Godoy, 2016).…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Slow 0.1 Hz Breathing and Body Posture Induced Perturbations of RRI and Respiratory Signal Complexity and Cardiorespiratory Coupling

et al. 2020

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Objective: We explored the physiological background of the non-linear operating mode of cardiorespiratory oscillators as the fundamental question of cardiorespiratory homeodynamics and as a prerequisite for the understanding of neurocardiovascular diseases. We investigated 20 healthy human subjects for changes using electrocardiac RR interval (RRI) and respiratory signal (Resp) Detrended Fluctuation Analysis (DFA, α 1RRI , α 2RRI , α 1Resp , α 2Resp), Multiple Scaling Entropy (MSE RRI1−4 , MSE RRI5−10 , MSE Resp1−4 , MSE Resp5−10), spectral coherence (Coh RRI−Resp), cross DFA (ρ 1 and ρ 2) and cross MSE (X MSE1−4 and X MSE5−10) indices in four physiological conditions: supine with spontaneous breathing, standing with spontaneous breathing, supine with 0.1 Hz breathing and standing with 0.1 Hz breathing. Main results: Standing is primarily characterized by the change of RRI parameters, insensitivity to change with respiratory parameters, decrease of Coh RRI−Resp and insensitivity to change of in ρ 1 , ρ 2 , X MSE1−4 , and X MSE5−10. Slow breathing in supine position was characterized by the change of the linear and non-linear parameters of both signals, reflecting the dominant vagal RRI modulation and the impact of slow 0.1 Hz breathing on Resp parameters. Coh RRI−Resp did not change with respect to supine position, while ρ 1 increased. Slow breathing in standing reflected the qualitatively specific state of autonomic regulation with striking impact on both cardiac and respiratory parameters, with specific patterns of cardiorespiratory coupling. Significance: Our results show that cardiac and respiratory short term and long term complexity parameters have different, state dependent patterns. Sympathovagal non-linear interactions are dependent on the pattern of their activation, having different scaling properties when individually activated with respect to the state of their joint activation. All investigated states induced a change of α 1 vs. α 2 relationship, which can be accurately expressed by the proposed measure-inter-fractal angle θ. Short scale (α 1 vs. MSE 1−4) and long scale (α 2 vs. MSE 5−10) complexity measures had reciprocal interrelation in standing with 0.1 Hz breathing, with specific cardiorespiratory coupling pattern (ρ 1 vs. X MSE1−4). These results support the hypothesis of hierarchical organization Matić et al. RRI-Respiratory Complexity and Cardiorespiratory Coupling of cardiorespiratory complexity mechanisms and their recruitment in ascendant manner with respect to the increase of behavioral challenge complexity. Specific and comprehensive cardiorespiratory regulation in standing with 0.1 Hz breathing suggests this state as the potentially most beneficial maneuver for cardiorespiratory conditioning.

show abstract

Slow breathing influences cardiac autonomic responses to postural maneuver

Cited by 19 publications

References 32 publications

CrossTalk proposal: Heart rate variability is a valid measure of cardiac autonomic responsiveness

CrossTalk proposal: Heart rate variability is a valid measure of cardiac autonomic responsiveness

The physiological effects of slow breathing in the healthy human

Slow 0.1 Hz Breathing and Body Posture Induced Perturbations of RRI and Respiratory Signal Complexity and Cardiorespiratory Coupling

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About