2009
DOI: 10.1215/00127094-2009-005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Slow blow-up solutions for the H1(R3) critical focusing semilinear wave equation

Abstract: Abstract. Given ν > 1 2 and δ > 0 arbitrary, we prove the existence of energy solutions ofin R 3+1 that blow up exactly at r = t = 0 as t → 0−. These solutions are radial and of the form u = λ(t)2 is the stationary solution of (0.1), and η is a radiation term with ZOutside of the light-cone there is the energy bound Zfor all small t > 0. The regularity of u increases with ν. As in our accompanying paper on wave-maps [10], the argument is based on a renormalization method for the 'soliton profile' W (r).

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
315
0
2

Year Published

2011
2011
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 157 publications
(322 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
5
315
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…which follows from L λ ΛW λ = 0 and L λ ρ λ = −k 2 λ 2 ρ λ , and ρ ∈ S. Such λ(u) is uniquely determined at least in the region 12) by the implicit function theorem, since…”
Section: Energy Distance Functionalmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…which follows from L λ ΛW λ = 0 and L λ ρ λ = −k 2 λ 2 ρ λ , and ρ ∈ S. Such λ(u) is uniquely determined at least in the region 12) by the implicit function theorem, since…”
Section: Energy Distance Functionalmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since ∇u 2 2 ∼ ∇W 2 2 in the hyperbolic region I H , we thus replace (5.6) with 12) and so from (5.5) we obtain…”
Section: Combining This and (416) We Infer Thatmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…which is a stationary solution of (1.1). The construction of [KST09] relies on an elaborate fixed point argument which yields the following description of the solution: In this work, we investigate the converse problem: if we consider an arbitrary type II radial blow-up solution, does such a decomposition hold?…”
Section: (N +1)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In [7], an explicit formula on the growth of the solution at infinity is given directly in terms of the initial data. Continuums of blow up rates were also observed in pioneering works by Krieger, Schlag and Tataru [15], [16] for energy critical wave problems, see also Donninger and Krieger [3]. All these results point out that the critical topology is not enough by itself to classify the flow near the ground state.…”
Section: Xxxvii-6mentioning
confidence: 66%
“…(Blow up) For all t ∈ [0, T ), u(t) ∈ T α * and the solution blows up in finite time T < +∞ in the regime described by Theorem 1 (14), (15), (16).…”
Section: Dynamical Characterization Of Qmentioning
confidence: 99%