2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.foreco.2013.07.017
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Slow and fast drivers of the natural disturbance regime in Central European forest ecosystems

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
88
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 106 publications
(93 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
5
88
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Although we have only used a minimal set of expert-based approximations for model parameterization, the results for bark beetle predisposition compare well with recent empirical studies (e.g., [8,38,39]) which found that high shares of Norway spruce and drought increased the susceptibility for bark beetle infestations. This is further amplified for situations where two or even more insect generations can develop within one growing season [40,41].…”
Section: Model Justificationsupporting
confidence: 73%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Although we have only used a minimal set of expert-based approximations for model parameterization, the results for bark beetle predisposition compare well with recent empirical studies (e.g., [8,38,39]) which found that high shares of Norway spruce and drought increased the susceptibility for bark beetle infestations. This is further amplified for situations where two or even more insect generations can develop within one growing season [40,41].…”
Section: Model Justificationsupporting
confidence: 73%
“…Netherer and Nopp-Mayr [37] confirmed the important relationship between bark beetle disturbances and stand canopy closure. Thom et al [38] described that older stands with a higher proportion of spruce leads to increased disturbances. However, there is reason to believe that the predisposing effect on bark beetle infestations increase on stand ages >100 years [39].…”
Section: Model Justificationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, secondary damage resulting from bark beetles outbreaks in the follow-up to large disturbances (Wermelinger et al 2002) are responsible, on average, for extra damage of between 10 and 25 % of initial wind damage (Stadelmann et al 2013). Thom et al (2013) demonstrated that for every cubic meter of bark beetle damage in the current year, 0.56 m 3 of additional bark beetle damage is expected in the following year. This not only means that sanitary concerns must be integrated as soon as possible in the decision-making scheme , but it emphasizes the need for an advanced cost-benefit analysis to inform decisions.…”
Section: Assessing Systemic Impacts Of Stormsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In recent years our quantitative understanding of disturbance processes has been increased regarding study improvements (SEIDL et al, 2011;THOM et al, 2013). These researchers prepared information on the historical range of variability of forest ecosystems to manage wind disturbance (KEANE et al, 2009).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%