IECON 2011 - 37th Annual Conference of the IEEE Industrial Electronics Society 2011
DOI: 10.1109/iecon.2011.6119910
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Slot/pole combinations choice for concentrated multiphase machines dedicated to mild-hybrid applications

Abstract: is an open access repository that collects the work of Arts et Métiers ParisTech researchers and makes it freely available over the web where possible.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
50
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 82 publications
(50 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
50
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Considering both fault-tolerant capability and power density, the slot/pole combinations for five-phase fault-tolerant PMSMs which satisfy 2p = Q ± 2 (where Q is number of slots, and 2p is number of poles) are proposed [36]. The rotor losses on such slot/pole combinations are thoroughly investigated in [15,19], and the analysis results indicate that in comparison with the low pole-number choice (2p = Q − 2), the high pole-number choice (2p = Q + 2) leads to higher rotor losses, which will reduce the power density. However, for the direct-drive outer-rotor machine used for four-wheel-drive EVs, the space limitation is serious, and compared with a low pole-number choice, the high pole-number choice results in a very shallow rotor core back and creates a "ring" type structure, and the center of the ring can be used to house the cooling system.…”
Section: Machine Specification and Slot/pole Combinations Choicementioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Considering both fault-tolerant capability and power density, the slot/pole combinations for five-phase fault-tolerant PMSMs which satisfy 2p = Q ± 2 (where Q is number of slots, and 2p is number of poles) are proposed [36]. The rotor losses on such slot/pole combinations are thoroughly investigated in [15,19], and the analysis results indicate that in comparison with the low pole-number choice (2p = Q − 2), the high pole-number choice (2p = Q + 2) leads to higher rotor losses, which will reduce the power density. However, for the direct-drive outer-rotor machine used for four-wheel-drive EVs, the space limitation is serious, and compared with a low pole-number choice, the high pole-number choice results in a very shallow rotor core back and creates a "ring" type structure, and the center of the ring can be used to house the cooling system.…”
Section: Machine Specification and Slot/pole Combinations Choicementioning
confidence: 99%
“…For the chosen 20-slot/22-pole winding configuration, the winding factor of single-layer winding is 0.9877, which is a little higher than that of double-layer winding, i.e., 0.9755. But double-layer winding features advantages in rotor losses and mechanical balancing [15,16], combining the high-efficiency requirement of EV applications, the 20-slot/22-pole double-layer winding configuration is further investigated in this paper. …”
Section: Research On 20-slot/22-pole Winding Topologiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Fig.1-a and Fig.1-b show the 20-slot/14-pole five-phase PMSM [16], in which fractional slot tooth concentrated winding and IPM rotor are used.…”
Section: Five-phase Pmsm Prototype and Modellingmentioning
confidence: 99%